So what If Barry Sotoero may not be eligible to be president and he persists in refraining to disclose his birth documents. So what Hussein Obama was closely tied with Tony Rezko, or the Hamas, Muslims, and other terrorists around the world contribute to his campaign. So what if BO worked closely with Ayers raising money to give to radical education. So what if Barack knows nothing about economy and has squandered millions on his own campaign. So what if Obama publicly supports his cousin Raille Odinga against the Kenyan government. So what if Obama committed treason when he was in Iraq asking to stall the troop recall.
The White House is still going to role out the red carpet for him and include a criminal to participate in major decision making that affects all Americans. That is what is so!
The families’ of the BTK victims should invite the BTK killer to Sunday dinner. So what if he killed their daughters!
Monday, September 29, 2008
FALSE ALARM
“National Financial Crisis the Sky is Falling Down Act Now” is a False Alarm. Another Desperate Obama Political Ploy
Any body who refrains from producing an authentic birth certificate to clarify his eligibility to be president of the United states; any one willing to jeopardize the lives of the American troops to benefit his own political career at the price of committing treason, is capable of doing any heinous act to succeed in his political ambitions. The greatest political prize in the whole world is the presidency of the United States. As has been proven repeatedly Obama and his thugs have a long track record of dirty tricks. The timing was absolutely too perfect. How convenient for a ruthless character like Obama to create a false financial crisis alarm precisely when BO’s poll numbers were trailing behind McCain. . It worked. Once again BO’s numbers are up in the polls. Based upon all of BO’s passed actions, it was only natural for me to be suspicious.
That is why I decided to do a two hour radio program with Hal Ballew, President of Homeloans, Inc. as guest speaker and an authority on the money market. All the king’s horses and all the king’s men could not have made me or our radio listener’s feel better last night when Hal Ballew let the world know “THERE IS NO CREDIT CRUCH. CREDIT IS AVAILABLE. THERE’S PLENTY OF MONEY. THE ONLY PROBLEM IS BASICALLY THE STINKING LYING DEMOCRATS AND THE LAME DUCK PRESIDENT.” We are all grateful to the insightful and clear thinking good men like Hal Ballew. We needed to hear what he said last night on the program. For those of you who missed it, you can hear it at your convenience at ww.blogtalkradio.com/menifeevalley.
That’s it. This is the last time Obama is going to get away with a stunt like that and expect the rest of the country to remain silent. Enough is enough! I and every other person who discovers the facts will publish them anywhere and everywhere we can. He wants to sing the tune. He must pay the fiddler. The price is exposure.
McCain must vote “no” against this “Emergency Economic Stabilization Act.” There is always a plan B and it is usually better! You can listen to the entire program from last night at menifeevalleyradio.com/Menifeevalley
The following was sent to me in the e-mail:
Barack Obama and the Strategy of Manufactured Crisis
Posted: 29 Sep 2008 09:50 AM CDT
Here is documentation that irrefutably chains Barack Obama to the most odious leftist movements in the United States today. Furthermore, it presents conclusive evidence that Obama not only knows of, but has participated in promotion of the Left's apocalyptic strategy of destruction for the United States: the Cloward-Piven Strategy of manufactured crisis. Don't miss the flow chart!
Quote from Saul Alinsky - Rules for Radicals 1989: Make the enemy [Conservative thought] live up to their (sic) own book of rules," When pressed to honor every word of every law and statute, every Judeo-Christian moral tenet, and every implicit promise of the liberal social contract, human agencies inevitably fall short. The system's failure to "live up" to its rule book can then be used to discredit it altogether, and to replace the capitalist "rule book" with a socialist one.
*****
Barack Obama and the Strategy of Manufactured Crisis
American Thinker, September 28, 2008 by Jim Simpson
Published at the request of Jim Simpson
Jim Simpson is a former White House staff economist and budget analyst. His writings have been published in American Thinker, Washington Times, FrontPage Magazine, DefenseWatch, Soldier of Fortune and others. His blog is Truth and Consequences..
America waits with bated breath while Washington struggles to bring the U.S. economy back from the brink of disaster. But many of those same politicians caused the crisis, and if left to their own devices will do so again.
Despite the mass media news blackout, a series of books, talk radio and the blogosphere have managed to expose Barack Obama's connections to his radical mentors -- Weather Underground bombers William Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, Communist Party member Frank Marshall Davis and others. David Horowitz and his Discover the Networks.org have also contributed a wealth of information and have noted Obama's radical connections since the beginning.
Yet, no one to my knowledge has yet connected all the dots between Barack Obama and the Radical Left. When seen together, the influences on Obama's life comprise a who's who of the radical leftist movement, and it becomes painfully apparent that not only is Obama a willing participant in that movement, he has spent most of his adult life deeply immersed in it.
But even this doesn't fully describe the extreme nature of this candidate. He can be tied directly to a malevolent overarching strategy that has motivated many, if not all, of the most destructive radical leftist organizations in the United States since the 1960s.
The Cloward-Piven Strategy of Orchestrated Crisis
In an earlier post, I noted the liberal record of unmitigated legislative disasters, the latest of which is now being played out in the financial markets before our eyes. Before the 1994 Republican takeover, Democrats had sixty years of virtually unbroken power in Congress - with substantial majorities most of the time. Can a group of smart people, studying issue after issue for years on end, with virtually unlimited resources at their command, not come up with a single policy that works? Why are they chronically incapable?
Why?
One of two things must be true. Either the Democrats are unfathomable idiots, who ignorantly pursue ever more destructive policies despite decades of contrary evidence, or they understand the consequences of their actions and relentlessly carry on anyway because they somehow benefit.
I submit to you they understand the consequences. For many it is simply a practical matter of eliciting votes from a targeted constituency at taxpayer expense; we lose a little, they gain a lot, and the politician keeps his job. But for others, the goal is more malevolent - the failure is deliberate. Don't laugh. This method not only has its proponents, it has a name: the Cloward-Piven Strategy. It describes their agenda, tactics, and long-term strategy.
The Strategy was first elucidated in the May 2, 1966 issue of The Nation magazine by a pair of radical socialist Columbia University professors, Richard Andrew Cloward and Frances Fox Piven. David Horowitz summarizes it as:
The strategy of forcing political change through orchestrated crisis. The "Cloward-Piven Strategy" seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse.
Cloward and Piven were inspired by radical organizer [and Hillary Clinton mentor] Saul Alinsky:
"Make the enemy live up to their (sic) own book of rules," Alinsky wrote in his 1989 book Rules for Radicals. When pressed to honor every word of every law and statute, every Judeo-Christian moral tenet, and every implicit promise of the liberal social contract, human agencies inevitably fall short. The system's failure to "live up" to its rule book can then be used to discredit it altogether, and to replace the capitalist "rule book" with a socialist one. (Courtesy Discover the Networks.org)
Newsmax rounds out the picture:
Their strategy to create political, financial, and social chaos that would result in revolution blended Alinsky concepts with their more aggressive efforts at bringing about a change in U.S. government. To achieve their revolutionary change, Cloward and Piven sought to use a cadre of aggressive organizers assisted by friendly news media to force a re-distribution of the nation's wealth.
In their Nation article, Cloward and Piven were specific about the kind of "crisis" they were trying to create:
By crisis, we mean a publicly visible disruption in some institutional sphere. Crisis can occur spontaneously (e.g., riots) or as the intended result of tactics of demonstration and protest which either generate institutional disruption or bring unrecognized disruption to public attention.
No matter where the strategy is implemented, it shares the following features:
1. The offensive organizes previously unorganized groups eligible for government benefits but not currently receiving all they can.
2. The offensive seeks to identify new beneficiaries and/or create new benefits.
3. The overarching aim is always to impose new stresses on target systems, with the ultimate goal of forcing their collapse.
Capitalizing on the racial unrest of the 1960s, Cloward and Piven saw the welfare system as their first target. They enlisted radical black activist George Wiley, who created the National Welfare Reform Organization (NWRO) to implement the strategy. Wiley hired militant foot soldiers to storm welfare offices around the country, violently demanding their "rights." According to a City Journal article by Sol Stern, welfare rolls increased from 4.3 million to 10.8 million by the mid-1970s as a result, and in New York City, where the strategy had been particularly successful, "one person was on the welfare rolls... for every two working in the city's private economy."
According to another City Journal article titled "Compassion Gone Mad":
The movement's impact on New York City was jolting: welfare caseloads, already climbing 12 percent a year in the early sixties, rose by 50 percent during Lindsay's first two years; spending doubled... The city had 150,000 welfare cases in 1960; a decade later it had 1.5 million.
The vast expansion of welfare in New York City that came of the NWRO's Cloward-Piven tactics sent the city into bankruptcy in 1975. Rudy Giuliani cited Cloward and Piven by name as being responsible for "an effort at economic sabotage." He also credited Cloward-Piven with changing the cultural attitude toward welfare from that of a temporary expedient to a lifetime entitlement, an attitude which in-and-of-itself has caused perhaps the greatest damage of all.
Cloward and Piven looked at this strategy as a gold mine of opportunity. Within the newly organized groups, each offensive would find an ample pool of foot soldier recruits willing to advance its radical agenda at little or no pay, and expand its base of reliable voters, legal or otherwise. The radicals' threatening tactics also would accrue an intimidating reputation, providing a wealth of opportunities for extorting monetary and other concessions from the target organizations. In the meantime, successful offensives would create an ever increasing drag on society. As they gleefully observed:
Moreover, this kind of mass influence is cumulative because benefits are continuous. Once eligibility for basic food and rent grants is established, the drain on local resources persists indefinitely.
The next time you drive through one of the many blighted neighborhoods in our cities, or read of the astronomical crime, drug addiction, and out-of-wedlock birth rates, or consider the failed schools, strapped police and fire resources of every major city, remember Cloward and Piven's thrill that "...the drain on local resources persists indefinitely."
ACORN, the new tip of the Cloward-Piven spear
In 1970, one of George Wiley's protégés, Wade Rathke -- like Bill Ayers, a member of the radical Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) -- was sent to found the Arkansas Community Organizations for Reform Now. While NWRO had made a good start, it alone couldn't accomplish the Cloward-Piven goals. Rathke's group broadened the offensive to include a wide array of low income "rights." Shortly thereafter they changed "Arkansas" to "Association of" and ACORN went nationwide.
Today ACORN is involved in a wide array of activities, including housing, voting rights, illegal immigration and other issues. According to ACORN's website: "ACORN is the nation's largest grassroots community organization of low-and moderate-income people with over 400,000 member families organized into more than 1,200 neighborhood chapters in 110 cities across the country," It is perhaps the largest radical group in the U.S. and has been cited for widespread criminal activity on many fronts.
Voting
On voting rights, ACORN and its voter mobilization subsidiary, Project Vote, have been involved nationwide in efforts to grant felons the vote and lobbied heavily for the Motor Voter Act of 1993, a law allowing people to register at motor vehicle departments, schools, libraries and other public places. That law had been sought by Cloward and Piven since the early1980s and they were present, standing behind President Clinton at the signing ceremony.
ACORN's voter rights tactics follow the Cloward-Piven Strategy:
• 1. Register as many Democrat voters as possible, legal or otherwise and help them vote, multiple times if possible.
• 2. Overwhelm the system with fraudulent registrations using multiple entries of the same name, names of deceased, random names from the phone book, even contrived names.
• 3. Make the system difficult to police by lobbying for minimal identification standards.
In this effort, ACORN sets up registration sites all over the country and has been frequently cited for turning in fraudulent registrations, as well as destroying republican applications. In the 2004-2006 election cycles alone, ACORN was accused of widespread voter fraud in 12 states. It may have swung the election for one state governor.
ACORN's website brags: "Since 2004, ACORN has helped more than 1.7 million low- and moderate-income and minority citizens apply to register to vote." Project vote boasts 4 million. I wonder how many of them are dead? For the 2008 cycle, ACORN and Project Vote have pulled out all the stops. Given their furious nationwide effort, it is not inconceivable that this presidential race could be decided by fraudulent votes alone.
Barack Obama ran ACORN's Project Vote in Chicago and his highly successful voter registration drive was credited with getting the disgraced former Senator Carol Moseley-Braun elected. Newsmax reiterates Cloward and Piven's aspirations for ACORN's voter registration efforts:
By advocating massive, no-holds-barred voter registration campaigns, they [Cloward & Piven] sought a Democratic administration in Washington, D.C. that would re-distribute the nation's wealth and lead to a totalitarian socialist state.
Illegal Immigration
As I have written elsewhere, the Radical Left's offensive to promote illegal immigration is "Cloward-Piven on steroids." ACORN is at the forefront of this movement as well, and was a leading organization among a broad coalition of radical groups, including Soros' Open Society Institute, the Service Employees International Union (ACORN founder Wade Rathke also runs a SEIU chapter), and others, that became the Coalition for Comprehensive Immigration Reform. CCIR fortunately failed to gain passage for the 2007 illegal immigrant amnesty bill, but its goals have not changed.
The burden of illegal immigration on our already overstressed welfare system has been widely documented. Some towns in California have even been taken over by illegal immigrant drug cartels. The disease, crime and overcrowding brought by illegal immigrants places a heavy burden on every segment of society and every level of government, threatening to split this country apart at the seams. In the meantime, radical leftist efforts to grant illegal immigrants citizenship guarantee a huge pool of new democrat voters. With little border control, terrorists can also filter in.
Obama aided ACORN as their lead attorney in a successful suit he brought against the Illinois state government to implement the Motor Voter law there. The law had been resisted by Republican Governor Jim Edgars, who feared the law was an opening to widespread vote fraud.
His fears were warranted as the Motor Voter law has since been cited as a major opportunity for vote fraud, especially for illegal immigrants, even terrorists. According to the Wall Street Journal: "After 9/11, the Justice Department found that eight of the 19 hijackers were registered to vote..."
ACORN's dual offensives on voting and illegal immigration are handy complements. Both swell the voter rolls with reliable democrats while assaulting the country ACORN seeks to destroy with overwhelming new problems.
Mortgage Crisis
And now we have the mortgage crisis, which has sent a shock wave through Wall Street and panicked world financial markets like no other since the stock market crash of 1929. But this is a problem created in Washington long ago. It originated with the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), signed into law in 1977 by President Jimmy Carter. The CRA was Carter's answer to a grassroots activist movement started in Chicago, and forced banks to make loans to low income, high risk customers. PhD economist and former Texas Senator Phil Gramm has called it: "a vast extortion scheme against the nation's banks."
ACORN aggressively sought to expand loans to low income groups using the CRA as a whip. Economist Stan Leibowitz wrote in the New York Post:
In the 1980s, groups such as the activists at ACORN began pushing charges of "redlining"-claims that banks discriminated against minorities in mortgage lending. In 1989, sympathetic members of Congress got the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act amended to force banks to collect racial data on mortgage applicants; this allowed various studies to be ginned up that seemed to validate the original accusation.
In fact, minority mortgage applications were rejected more frequently than other applications-but the overwhelming reason wasn't racial discrimination, but simply that minorities tend to have weaker finances.
ACORN showed its colors again in 1991, by taking over the House Banking Committee room for two days to protest efforts to scale back the CRA. Obama represented ACORN in the Buycks-Roberson v. Citibank Fed. Sav. Bank, 1994 suit against redlining. Most significant of all, ACORN was the driving force behind a 1995 regulatory revision pushed through by the Clinton Administration that greatly expanded the CRA and laid the groundwork for the Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac borne financial crisis we now confront. Barack Obama was the attorney representing ACORN in this effort. With this new authority, ACORN used its subsidiary, ACORN Housing, to promote subprime loans more aggressively.
As a New York Post article describes it:
A 1995 strengthening of the Community Reinvestment Act required banks to find ways to provide mortgages to their poorer communities. It also let community activists intervene at yearly bank reviews, shaking the banks down for large pots of money.
Banks that got poor reviews were punished; some saw their merger plans frustrated; others faced direct legal challenges by the Justice Department.
Flexible lending programs expanded even though they had higher default rates than loans with traditional standards. On the Web, you can still find CRA loans available via ACORN with "100 percent financing . . . no credit scores . . . undocumented income . . . even if you don't report it on your tax returns." Credit counseling is required, of course.
Ironically, an enthusiastic Fannie Mae Foundation report singled out one paragon of nondiscriminatory lending, which worked with community activists and followed "the most flexible underwriting criteria permitted." That lender's $1 billion commitment to low-income loans in 1992 had grown to $80 billion by 1999 and $600 billion by early 2003.
The lender they were speaking of was Countrywide, which specialized in subprime lending and had a working relationship with ACORN.
Investor's Business Daily added:
The revisions also allowed for the first time the securitization of CRA-regulated loans containing subprime mortgages. The changes came as radical "housing rights" groups led by ACORN lobbied for such loans. ACORN at the time was represented by a young public-interest lawyer in Chicago by the name of Barack Obama. (Emphasis, mine.)
Since these loans were to be underwritten by the government sponsored Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the implicit government guarantee of those loans absolved lenders, mortgage bundlers and investors of any concern over the obvious risk. As Bloomberg reported: "It is a classic case of socializing the risk while privatizing the profit."
And if you think Washington policy makers cared about ACORN's negative influence, think again. Before this whole mess came down, a Democrat-sponsored bill on the table would have created an "Affordable Housing Trust Fund," granting ACORN access to approximately $500 million in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac revenues with little or no oversight.
Even now, unbelievably -- on the brink of national disaster -- Democrats have insisted ACORN benefit from bailout negotiations! Senator Lindsay Graham reported last night (9/25/08) in an interview with Greta Van Susteren of On the Record that Democrats want 20 percent of the bailout money to go to ACORN!
This entire fiasco represents perhaps the pinnacle of ACORN's efforts to advance the Cloward-Piven Strategy and is a stark demonstration of the power they wield in Washington.
Enter Barack Obama
In attempting to capture the significance of Barack Obama's Radical Left connections and his relation to the Cloward Piven strategy, I constructed the following flow chart. It is by no means complete. There are simply too many radical individuals and organizations to include them all here. But these are perhaps the most significant.
The chart puts Barack Obama at the epicenter of an incestuous stew of American radical leftism. Not only are his connections significant, they practically define who he is. Taken together, they constitute a who's who of the American radical left, and guiding all is the Cloward-Piven strategy.
Conspicuous in their absence are any connections at all with any other group, moderate, or even mildly leftist. They are all radicals, firmly bedded in the anti-American, communist, socialist, radical leftist mesh.
Saul Alinsky
Most people are unaware that Barack Obama received his training in "community organizing" from Saul Alinsky's Industrial Areas Foundation. But he did. In and of itself that marks his heritage and training as that of a radical activist. One really needs go no further. But we have.
Bill Ayers
Obama objects to being associated with SDS bomber Bill Ayers, claiming he is being smeared with "guilt by association." But they worked together at the Woods Fund. The Wall Street Journal added substantially to our knowledge by describing in great detail Obama's work over five years with SDS bomber Bill Ayers on the board of a non-profit, the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, to push a radical agenda on public school children. As Stanley Kurtz states:
"...the issue here isn't guilt by association; it's guilt by participation. As CAC chairman, Mr. Obama was lending moral and financial support to Mr. Ayers and his radical circle. That is a story even if Mr. Ayers had never planted a single bomb 40 years ago."
Also included in the mix is Theresa Heinz Kerry's favorite charity, the Tides Foundation. A partial list of Tides grants tells you all you need to know: ACLU, ACORN, Center for American Progress, Center for Constitutional Rights (a communist front,) CAIR, Earth Justice, Institute for Policy Studies (KGB spy nest), National Lawyers Guild (oldest communist front in U.S.), People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), and practically every other radical group there is. ACORN's Wade Rathke runs a Tides subsidiary, the Tides Center.
Carl Davidson and the New Party
We have heard about Bomber Bill, but we hear little about fellow SDS member Carl Davidson. According to Discover the Networks, Davidson was an early supporter of Barack Obama and a prominent member of Chicago's New Party, a synthesis of CPUSA members, Socialists, ACORN veterans and other radicals. Obama sought and received the New Party's endorsement, and they assisted with his campaign. The New Party also developed a strong relationship with ACORN. As an excellent article on the New Party observes: "Barack Obama knew what he was getting into and remains an ideal New Party candidate."
George Soros
The chart also suggests the reason for George Soros' fervent support of Obama. The President of his Open Society Institute is Aryeh Neier, founder of the radical Students for a Democratic Society (SDS). As mentioned above, three other former SDS members had extensive contact with Obama: Bill Ayers, Carl Davidson and Wade Rathke. Surely Aryeh Neier would have heard from his former colleagues of the promising new politician. More to the point, Neier is firmly committed to supporting the hugely successful radical organization, ACORN, and would be certain back their favored candidate, Barack Obama.
ACORN
Obama has spent a large portion of his professional life working for ACORN or its subsidiaries, representing ACORN as a lawyer on some of its most critical issues, and training ACORN leaders. Stanley Kurtz's excellent National Review article, "Inside Obama's Acorn." also describes Obama's ACORN connection in detail. But I can't improve on Obama's own words:
I've been fighting alongside ACORN on issues you care about my entire career (emphasis added). Even before I was an elected official, when I ran Project Vote voter registration drive in Illinois, ACORN was smack dab in the middle of it, and we appreciate your work. - Barack Obama, Speech to ACORN, November 2007 (Courtesy Newsmax.)
In another excellent article on Obama's ACORN connections, Newsmax asks a nagging question:
It would be telling to know if Obama, during his years at Columbia, had occasion to meet Cloward and study the Cloward-Piven Strategy.
I ask you, is it possible ACORN would train Obama to take leadership positions within ACORN without telling him what he was training for? Is it possible ACORN would put Obama in leadership positions without clueing him into what his purpose was?? Is it possible that this most radical of organizations would put someone in charge of training its trainers, without him knowing what it was he was training them for?
As a community activist for ACORN; as a leadership trainer for ACORN; as a lead organizer for ACORN's Project Vote; as an attorney representing ACORN's successful efforts to impose Motor Voter regulations in Illinois; as ACORN's representative in lobbying for the expansion of high risk housing loans through Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that led to the current crisis; as a recipient of their assistance in his political campaigns -- both with money and campaign workers; it is doubtful that he was unaware of ACORN's true goals. It is doubtful he was unaware of the Cloward-Piven Strategy.
Fast-forward to 2005 when an obsequious, servile and scraping Daniel Mudd, CEO of Fannie Mae spoke at the Congressional Black Caucus swearing in ceremony for newly-elected Illinois Senator, Barack Obama. Mudd called, the Congressional Black Caucus "our family" and "the conscience of Fannie Mae."
In 2005, Republicans sought to rein in Fannie and Freddie. Senator John McCain was at the forefront of that effort. But it failed due to an intense lobbying effort put forward by Fannie and Freddie.
In his few years as a U.S. senator, Obama has received campaign contributions of $126,349, from Fannie and Freddie, second only to the $165,400 received by Senator Chris Dodd, who has been getting donations from them since 1988. What makes Obama so special?
His closest advisers are a dirty laundry list of individuals at the heart of the financial crisis: former Fannie Mae CEO Jim Johnson; Former Fannie Mae CEO and former Clinton Budget Director Frank Raines; and billionaire failed Superior Bank of Chicago Board Chair Penny Pritzker.
Johnson had to step down as adviser on Obama's V.P. search after this gem came out:
An Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) report[1] from September 2004 found that, during Johnson's tenure as CEO, Fannie Mae had improperly deferred $200 million in expenses. This enabled top executives, including Johnson and his successor, Franklin Raines, to receive substantial bonuses in 1998.[2] A 2006 OFHEO report[3] found that Fannie Mae had substantially under-reported Johnson's compensation. Originally reported as $6-7 million, Johnson actually received approximately $21 million.
Obama denies ties to Raines but the Washington Post calls him a member of "Obama's political circle." Raines and Johnson were fined $3 million by the Office of Federal Housing Oversight for their manipulation of Fannie books. The fine is small change however, compared to the $50 million Raines was able to obtain in improper bonuses as a result of juggling the books.
Most significantly, Penny Pritzker, the current Finance Chairperson of Obama's presidential campaign helped develop the complicated investment bundling of subprime securities at the heart of the meltdown. She did so in her position as shareholder and board chair of Superior Bank. The Bank failed in 2001, one of the largest in recent history, wiping out $50 million in uninsured life savings of approximately 1,400 customers. She was named in a RICO class action law suit but doesn't seem to have come out of it too badly.
As a young attorney in the 1990s, Barack Obama represented ACORN in Washington in their successful efforts to expand Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) authority. In addition to making it easier for ACORN groups to force banks into making risky loans, this also paved the way for banks like Superior to package mortgages as investments, and for the Government Sponsored Enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to underwrite them. These changes created the conditions that ultimately lead to the current financial crisis.
Did they not know this would occur? Were these smart people, led by a Harvard graduate, unaware of the Econ 101 concept of moral hazard that would result from the government making implicit guarantees to underwrite private sector financial risk? They should have known that freeing the high-risk mortgage market of risk, calamity was sure to ensue. I think they did.
Barack Obama, the Cloward-Piven candidate, no matter how he describes himself, has been a radical activist for most of his political career. That activism has been in support of organizations and initiatives that at their heart seek to tear the pillars of this nation asunder in order to replace them with their demented socialist vision. Their influence has spread so far and so wide that despite their blatant culpability in the current financial crisis, they are able to manipulate Capital Hill politicians to cut them into $140 billion of the bailout pie!
God grant those few responsible yet remaining in Washington, DC the strength to prevent this massive fraud from occurring. God grant them the courage to stand up in the face of this Marxist tidal wave.
.
Barack Obama and the Strategy of Manufactured Crisis
Posted: 29 Sep 2008 09:44 AM CDT
UPDATED: This article is now available, in full, on Wake up America here.
Here is documentation that irrefutably chains Barack Obama to the most odious leftist movements in the United States today.
Obama’s 'Truth Squad' Threatens Freedom of Speech
Posted: 28 Sep 2008 04:34 PM CDT
A bold maneuver, unprecedented in American politics, has pitted the Obama campaign against freedom of speech. Missouri authorities will pursue criminal charges against those who speak “falsely” against Barack Obama.
"Enlisting Missouri law enforcement to intimidate people and kill free debate is reminiscent of the Sedition Acts - not a free society.” (From a statement issued by Governor Matt Blunt on Sept. 24)
St. Louis City Circuit Attorney Jennifer Joyce and St. Louis County Circuit Attorney Bob McCulloch, both members of The Obama Truth Squad, have threatened to bring libel charges against those who speak out falsely against Barack Obama. Some say that such threats by Missouri authorities to pursue criminal charges violate civil rights. Many see this as an attempt by the Obama campaign at voter intimidation.
KMOV has a Sept. 23 video news report on this story. The report clearly shows involvement by the Obama campaign. This is an excerpt from the KVOV report:
“Sen Barack Obama’s Presidential campaign is asking Missouri law enforcement to target anyone who lies or runs a misleading television ad during the Presidential campaign . . . Prosecutors and sheriffs from across Missouri are joining something called the Barack Obama Truth Squad . . .”
According to Saint Louis CofCC Blog the attempts by the Obama campaign at voter intimidation are clear, but in actuality “virtually nobody that levels criticism at Barack Obama can be charged criminally for doing so.”
The implication here is also clear — if people with badges and guns are getting involved, they want Obama critics to shut up lest some cop will arrest them and send them to jail. We also found out from this news clip that this is indeed all at the behest of the Obama campaign. . .
Based on the 1964, the U.S. Supreme Court landmark decision, New York Times vs Sullivan, Saint Louis CofCC Blog goes on to explain that if a “prosecutorial authority brings criminal libel charges against a defendant on behalf of a plaintiff, as McCulloch and Joyce are threatening to do, then the prosecutor has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt to twelve out of twelve jurors that the defendant knowingly said or wrote something factually incorrect about the defendant.”
The two key concepts here are “knowingly” and “factual.” Successful civil libel lawsuits brought by public figures are exceedingly rare, because it’s very difficult to prove that the defendant “knowingly” said or wrote something factually incorrect. Criminal libel prosecutions thereof, because they require a unanimous jury and a higher legal standard of proof, are virtually impossible.
As for “factual,” it means that the statement made cannot relate to an opinion. If you say that Barack Obama isn’t really a Christian, that’s not a statement of fact, because religion is mostly subjective. The Catholic Church still really doesn’t consider Protestants to be Christians, and in some cases, some radical Protestants don’t think that Catholics are really Christians. Therefore, if one says that Barack Obama isn’t a Christian, it isn’t actionable, because it’s somebody’s opinion. Now, if Obama were a Catholic, and really was Confirmed as such, and someone for whom that it can be proven does know he is a Confirmed Catholic goes out and says that he isn’t, that’s actionable. The reason is that Confirmation in the Catholic Church is (usually) provable by ecclesiastical records.
Federal civil rights lawsuits could be brought against Missouri officials and the Obama campaign under several statutes such as the First Amendment Retaliation (under 42 USC Section 1983), or “under the KKK Act (42 USC Section 1985) – it is unlawful for two or more persons to form a conspiracy to use threats or intimidation to prevent the exercise of civil rights (including voting).”
Instapundit.com has listed several other attempts at free speech intimidation by the Obama campaign.
Stephen Kruiser of America Needs Me writes:
. . .There is a disturbing pattern of thuggish behavior by Obama and his supporters. Obama himself finally let the mask slip for a moment when he told supporters to go out and “get in peoples’ faces”. He then dispatched his minions to threaten and silence critics.
The Fredericksburg Free Lance Star has an editorial about the Obama campaign banning signs and banners during his rally Saturday at the University of Mary Washington in Virginia.
. . .Mr. Obama, the Democratic nominee for president, is scheduled to speak at a rally at the university today. The public is invited to this forum, on property it, the public, owns. However, signs and banners will not be allowed, according to the organizers and compliant campus officials. Suddenly, UMW is a First Amendment-Free, or at least a First Amendment-Crippled, Zone, subject to the self-serving preferences of politicos. Why does an Obama rally–or a McCain rally or a Nader rally–justify taking a little off the top of Americans’ most fundamental rights?
A UMW spokeswoman says that the Obama campaign required the sign-and-banner ban. That campaign tells us that the ban is for “security” reasons. But a spokesman for the U.S. Secret Service, responsible for protecting presidential candidates, says that the service has no objection to signs at rallies, provided that no “part of the sign could be used as a weapon”–e.g., a heavy metal pole or a sharpened stick. Finally, the McCain campaign tells us, “We encourage people to make signs at our events.” . . .
The First Amendment guarantees the freedoms of religion, speech, the press, peaceable assembly, petition of the government. Will one who aspires to the title Defender of the Constitution begin inhibiting these First Freedoms even before he is in office--at a public university?
Some are drawing inferences that Obama’s Truth Squad is a precursor to Obama’s plan for a civilian national security force. In July World Net Daily wrote:
Democrat Sen. Barack Obama's stunning assertion in a recent speech that the U.S. needs a "civilian national security force" that would be as powerful, strong and well-funded as the half-trillion dollar Army, Marines, Navy and Air Force is not included in published transcripts of his prepared remarks. . . Campaign officials have declined to return any of a series of WND telephone calls over several days requesting comment. Nor have they posted a transcript of the speech on their website.
Gateway Pundit warns Obama Stalinist Police State Already Taking Form
. . .Reminiscent of the beginning of the Stalin purges, the Obama “Truth Squads” seem to be the beginning of Obama’s plan to end free speech and create a police state that is beholden only to its secular messiah. Note: Stalin’s purges were affected by his country-wide police forces to silence political opponents. The Obama campaign has also advised Missouri law enforcement throughout the state to look for anything that the Obama campaign determines a lie. . . One of the most frightening aspects of all of this—as if it could become any more horrific—is that Missouri law enforcement now appears to be following Obama’s marching orders and it is being allowed to get away with these gangster tactics! . .
Here’s the statement issued by Governor Matt Blunt on Sept. 24.
Gov. Blunt Statement on Obama Campaign’s Abusive Use of Missouri Law Enforcement
JEFFERSON CITY - Gov. Matt Blunt today issued the following statement on news reports that have exposed plans by U.S. Senator Barack Obama to use Missouri law enforcement to threaten and intimidate his critics.
“St. Louis County Circuit Attorney Bob McCulloch, St. Louis City Circuit Attorney Jennifer Joyce, Jefferson County Sheriff Glenn Boyer, and Obama and the leader of his Missouri campaign Senator Claire McCaskill have attached the stench of police state tactics to the Obama-Biden campaign.
“What Senator Obama and his helpers are doing is scandalous beyond words, the party that claims to be the party of Thomas Jefferson is abusing the justice system and offices of public trust to silence political criticism with threats of prosecution and criminal punishment.
“This abuse of the law for intimidation insults the most sacred principles and ideals of Jefferson. I can think of nothing more offensive to Jefferson’s thinking than using the power of the state to deprive Americans of their civil rights. The only conceivable purpose of Messrs. McCulloch, Obama and the others is to frighten people away from expressing themselves, to chill free and open debate, to suppress support and donations to conservative organizations targeted by this anti-civil rights, to strangle criticism of Mr. Obama, to suppress ads about his support of higher taxes, and to choke out criticism on television, radio, the Internet, blogs, e-mail and daily conversation about the election.
“Barack Obama needs to grow up. Leftist blogs and others in the press constantly say false things about me and my family. Usually, we ignore false and scurrilous accusations because the purveyors have no credibility. When necessary, we refute them. Enlisting Missouri law enforcement to intimidate people and kill free debate is reminiscent of the Sedition Acts - not a free society.”
Technorati Tags: Missouri,Virginia,law enforcement,intimidation,voter,vote,authorities,Barack Obama,Obama,Truth Squad,freedom of speech,1st Amendment,civil rights,civilian national security force,University of Mary
Any body who refrains from producing an authentic birth certificate to clarify his eligibility to be president of the United states; any one willing to jeopardize the lives of the American troops to benefit his own political career at the price of committing treason, is capable of doing any heinous act to succeed in his political ambitions. The greatest political prize in the whole world is the presidency of the United States. As has been proven repeatedly Obama and his thugs have a long track record of dirty tricks. The timing was absolutely too perfect. How convenient for a ruthless character like Obama to create a false financial crisis alarm precisely when BO’s poll numbers were trailing behind McCain. . It worked. Once again BO’s numbers are up in the polls. Based upon all of BO’s passed actions, it was only natural for me to be suspicious.
That is why I decided to do a two hour radio program with Hal Ballew, President of Homeloans, Inc. as guest speaker and an authority on the money market. All the king’s horses and all the king’s men could not have made me or our radio listener’s feel better last night when Hal Ballew let the world know “THERE IS NO CREDIT CRUCH. CREDIT IS AVAILABLE. THERE’S PLENTY OF MONEY. THE ONLY PROBLEM IS BASICALLY THE STINKING LYING DEMOCRATS AND THE LAME DUCK PRESIDENT.” We are all grateful to the insightful and clear thinking good men like Hal Ballew. We needed to hear what he said last night on the program. For those of you who missed it, you can hear it at your convenience at ww.blogtalkradio.com/menifeevalley.
That’s it. This is the last time Obama is going to get away with a stunt like that and expect the rest of the country to remain silent. Enough is enough! I and every other person who discovers the facts will publish them anywhere and everywhere we can. He wants to sing the tune. He must pay the fiddler. The price is exposure.
McCain must vote “no” against this “Emergency Economic Stabilization Act.” There is always a plan B and it is usually better! You can listen to the entire program from last night at menifeevalleyradio.com/Menifeevalley
The following was sent to me in the e-mail:
Barack Obama and the Strategy of Manufactured Crisis
Posted: 29 Sep 2008 09:50 AM CDT
Here is documentation that irrefutably chains Barack Obama to the most odious leftist movements in the United States today. Furthermore, it presents conclusive evidence that Obama not only knows of, but has participated in promotion of the Left's apocalyptic strategy of destruction for the United States: the Cloward-Piven Strategy of manufactured crisis. Don't miss the flow chart!
Quote from Saul Alinsky - Rules for Radicals 1989: Make the enemy [Conservative thought] live up to their (sic) own book of rules," When pressed to honor every word of every law and statute, every Judeo-Christian moral tenet, and every implicit promise of the liberal social contract, human agencies inevitably fall short. The system's failure to "live up" to its rule book can then be used to discredit it altogether, and to replace the capitalist "rule book" with a socialist one.
*****
Barack Obama and the Strategy of Manufactured Crisis
American Thinker, September 28, 2008 by Jim Simpson
Published at the request of Jim Simpson
Jim Simpson is a former White House staff economist and budget analyst. His writings have been published in American Thinker, Washington Times, FrontPage Magazine, DefenseWatch, Soldier of Fortune and others. His blog is Truth and Consequences..
America waits with bated breath while Washington struggles to bring the U.S. economy back from the brink of disaster. But many of those same politicians caused the crisis, and if left to their own devices will do so again.
Despite the mass media news blackout, a series of books, talk radio and the blogosphere have managed to expose Barack Obama's connections to his radical mentors -- Weather Underground bombers William Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, Communist Party member Frank Marshall Davis and others. David Horowitz and his Discover the Networks.org have also contributed a wealth of information and have noted Obama's radical connections since the beginning.
Yet, no one to my knowledge has yet connected all the dots between Barack Obama and the Radical Left. When seen together, the influences on Obama's life comprise a who's who of the radical leftist movement, and it becomes painfully apparent that not only is Obama a willing participant in that movement, he has spent most of his adult life deeply immersed in it.
But even this doesn't fully describe the extreme nature of this candidate. He can be tied directly to a malevolent overarching strategy that has motivated many, if not all, of the most destructive radical leftist organizations in the United States since the 1960s.
The Cloward-Piven Strategy of Orchestrated Crisis
In an earlier post, I noted the liberal record of unmitigated legislative disasters, the latest of which is now being played out in the financial markets before our eyes. Before the 1994 Republican takeover, Democrats had sixty years of virtually unbroken power in Congress - with substantial majorities most of the time. Can a group of smart people, studying issue after issue for years on end, with virtually unlimited resources at their command, not come up with a single policy that works? Why are they chronically incapable?
Why?
One of two things must be true. Either the Democrats are unfathomable idiots, who ignorantly pursue ever more destructive policies despite decades of contrary evidence, or they understand the consequences of their actions and relentlessly carry on anyway because they somehow benefit.
I submit to you they understand the consequences. For many it is simply a practical matter of eliciting votes from a targeted constituency at taxpayer expense; we lose a little, they gain a lot, and the politician keeps his job. But for others, the goal is more malevolent - the failure is deliberate. Don't laugh. This method not only has its proponents, it has a name: the Cloward-Piven Strategy. It describes their agenda, tactics, and long-term strategy.
The Strategy was first elucidated in the May 2, 1966 issue of The Nation magazine by a pair of radical socialist Columbia University professors, Richard Andrew Cloward and Frances Fox Piven. David Horowitz summarizes it as:
The strategy of forcing political change through orchestrated crisis. The "Cloward-Piven Strategy" seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse.
Cloward and Piven were inspired by radical organizer [and Hillary Clinton mentor] Saul Alinsky:
"Make the enemy live up to their (sic) own book of rules," Alinsky wrote in his 1989 book Rules for Radicals. When pressed to honor every word of every law and statute, every Judeo-Christian moral tenet, and every implicit promise of the liberal social contract, human agencies inevitably fall short. The system's failure to "live up" to its rule book can then be used to discredit it altogether, and to replace the capitalist "rule book" with a socialist one. (Courtesy Discover the Networks.org)
Newsmax rounds out the picture:
Their strategy to create political, financial, and social chaos that would result in revolution blended Alinsky concepts with their more aggressive efforts at bringing about a change in U.S. government. To achieve their revolutionary change, Cloward and Piven sought to use a cadre of aggressive organizers assisted by friendly news media to force a re-distribution of the nation's wealth.
In their Nation article, Cloward and Piven were specific about the kind of "crisis" they were trying to create:
By crisis, we mean a publicly visible disruption in some institutional sphere. Crisis can occur spontaneously (e.g., riots) or as the intended result of tactics of demonstration and protest which either generate institutional disruption or bring unrecognized disruption to public attention.
No matter where the strategy is implemented, it shares the following features:
1. The offensive organizes previously unorganized groups eligible for government benefits but not currently receiving all they can.
2. The offensive seeks to identify new beneficiaries and/or create new benefits.
3. The overarching aim is always to impose new stresses on target systems, with the ultimate goal of forcing their collapse.
Capitalizing on the racial unrest of the 1960s, Cloward and Piven saw the welfare system as their first target. They enlisted radical black activist George Wiley, who created the National Welfare Reform Organization (NWRO) to implement the strategy. Wiley hired militant foot soldiers to storm welfare offices around the country, violently demanding their "rights." According to a City Journal article by Sol Stern, welfare rolls increased from 4.3 million to 10.8 million by the mid-1970s as a result, and in New York City, where the strategy had been particularly successful, "one person was on the welfare rolls... for every two working in the city's private economy."
According to another City Journal article titled "Compassion Gone Mad":
The movement's impact on New York City was jolting: welfare caseloads, already climbing 12 percent a year in the early sixties, rose by 50 percent during Lindsay's first two years; spending doubled... The city had 150,000 welfare cases in 1960; a decade later it had 1.5 million.
The vast expansion of welfare in New York City that came of the NWRO's Cloward-Piven tactics sent the city into bankruptcy in 1975. Rudy Giuliani cited Cloward and Piven by name as being responsible for "an effort at economic sabotage." He also credited Cloward-Piven with changing the cultural attitude toward welfare from that of a temporary expedient to a lifetime entitlement, an attitude which in-and-of-itself has caused perhaps the greatest damage of all.
Cloward and Piven looked at this strategy as a gold mine of opportunity. Within the newly organized groups, each offensive would find an ample pool of foot soldier recruits willing to advance its radical agenda at little or no pay, and expand its base of reliable voters, legal or otherwise. The radicals' threatening tactics also would accrue an intimidating reputation, providing a wealth of opportunities for extorting monetary and other concessions from the target organizations. In the meantime, successful offensives would create an ever increasing drag on society. As they gleefully observed:
Moreover, this kind of mass influence is cumulative because benefits are continuous. Once eligibility for basic food and rent grants is established, the drain on local resources persists indefinitely.
The next time you drive through one of the many blighted neighborhoods in our cities, or read of the astronomical crime, drug addiction, and out-of-wedlock birth rates, or consider the failed schools, strapped police and fire resources of every major city, remember Cloward and Piven's thrill that "...the drain on local resources persists indefinitely."
ACORN, the new tip of the Cloward-Piven spear
In 1970, one of George Wiley's protégés, Wade Rathke -- like Bill Ayers, a member of the radical Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) -- was sent to found the Arkansas Community Organizations for Reform Now. While NWRO had made a good start, it alone couldn't accomplish the Cloward-Piven goals. Rathke's group broadened the offensive to include a wide array of low income "rights." Shortly thereafter they changed "Arkansas" to "Association of" and ACORN went nationwide.
Today ACORN is involved in a wide array of activities, including housing, voting rights, illegal immigration and other issues. According to ACORN's website: "ACORN is the nation's largest grassroots community organization of low-and moderate-income people with over 400,000 member families organized into more than 1,200 neighborhood chapters in 110 cities across the country," It is perhaps the largest radical group in the U.S. and has been cited for widespread criminal activity on many fronts.
Voting
On voting rights, ACORN and its voter mobilization subsidiary, Project Vote, have been involved nationwide in efforts to grant felons the vote and lobbied heavily for the Motor Voter Act of 1993, a law allowing people to register at motor vehicle departments, schools, libraries and other public places. That law had been sought by Cloward and Piven since the early1980s and they were present, standing behind President Clinton at the signing ceremony.
ACORN's voter rights tactics follow the Cloward-Piven Strategy:
• 1. Register as many Democrat voters as possible, legal or otherwise and help them vote, multiple times if possible.
• 2. Overwhelm the system with fraudulent registrations using multiple entries of the same name, names of deceased, random names from the phone book, even contrived names.
• 3. Make the system difficult to police by lobbying for minimal identification standards.
In this effort, ACORN sets up registration sites all over the country and has been frequently cited for turning in fraudulent registrations, as well as destroying republican applications. In the 2004-2006 election cycles alone, ACORN was accused of widespread voter fraud in 12 states. It may have swung the election for one state governor.
ACORN's website brags: "Since 2004, ACORN has helped more than 1.7 million low- and moderate-income and minority citizens apply to register to vote." Project vote boasts 4 million. I wonder how many of them are dead? For the 2008 cycle, ACORN and Project Vote have pulled out all the stops. Given their furious nationwide effort, it is not inconceivable that this presidential race could be decided by fraudulent votes alone.
Barack Obama ran ACORN's Project Vote in Chicago and his highly successful voter registration drive was credited with getting the disgraced former Senator Carol Moseley-Braun elected. Newsmax reiterates Cloward and Piven's aspirations for ACORN's voter registration efforts:
By advocating massive, no-holds-barred voter registration campaigns, they [Cloward & Piven] sought a Democratic administration in Washington, D.C. that would re-distribute the nation's wealth and lead to a totalitarian socialist state.
Illegal Immigration
As I have written elsewhere, the Radical Left's offensive to promote illegal immigration is "Cloward-Piven on steroids." ACORN is at the forefront of this movement as well, and was a leading organization among a broad coalition of radical groups, including Soros' Open Society Institute, the Service Employees International Union (ACORN founder Wade Rathke also runs a SEIU chapter), and others, that became the Coalition for Comprehensive Immigration Reform. CCIR fortunately failed to gain passage for the 2007 illegal immigrant amnesty bill, but its goals have not changed.
The burden of illegal immigration on our already overstressed welfare system has been widely documented. Some towns in California have even been taken over by illegal immigrant drug cartels. The disease, crime and overcrowding brought by illegal immigrants places a heavy burden on every segment of society and every level of government, threatening to split this country apart at the seams. In the meantime, radical leftist efforts to grant illegal immigrants citizenship guarantee a huge pool of new democrat voters. With little border control, terrorists can also filter in.
Obama aided ACORN as their lead attorney in a successful suit he brought against the Illinois state government to implement the Motor Voter law there. The law had been resisted by Republican Governor Jim Edgars, who feared the law was an opening to widespread vote fraud.
His fears were warranted as the Motor Voter law has since been cited as a major opportunity for vote fraud, especially for illegal immigrants, even terrorists. According to the Wall Street Journal: "After 9/11, the Justice Department found that eight of the 19 hijackers were registered to vote..."
ACORN's dual offensives on voting and illegal immigration are handy complements. Both swell the voter rolls with reliable democrats while assaulting the country ACORN seeks to destroy with overwhelming new problems.
Mortgage Crisis
And now we have the mortgage crisis, which has sent a shock wave through Wall Street and panicked world financial markets like no other since the stock market crash of 1929. But this is a problem created in Washington long ago. It originated with the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), signed into law in 1977 by President Jimmy Carter. The CRA was Carter's answer to a grassroots activist movement started in Chicago, and forced banks to make loans to low income, high risk customers. PhD economist and former Texas Senator Phil Gramm has called it: "a vast extortion scheme against the nation's banks."
ACORN aggressively sought to expand loans to low income groups using the CRA as a whip. Economist Stan Leibowitz wrote in the New York Post:
In the 1980s, groups such as the activists at ACORN began pushing charges of "redlining"-claims that banks discriminated against minorities in mortgage lending. In 1989, sympathetic members of Congress got the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act amended to force banks to collect racial data on mortgage applicants; this allowed various studies to be ginned up that seemed to validate the original accusation.
In fact, minority mortgage applications were rejected more frequently than other applications-but the overwhelming reason wasn't racial discrimination, but simply that minorities tend to have weaker finances.
ACORN showed its colors again in 1991, by taking over the House Banking Committee room for two days to protest efforts to scale back the CRA. Obama represented ACORN in the Buycks-Roberson v. Citibank Fed. Sav. Bank, 1994 suit against redlining. Most significant of all, ACORN was the driving force behind a 1995 regulatory revision pushed through by the Clinton Administration that greatly expanded the CRA and laid the groundwork for the Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac borne financial crisis we now confront. Barack Obama was the attorney representing ACORN in this effort. With this new authority, ACORN used its subsidiary, ACORN Housing, to promote subprime loans more aggressively.
As a New York Post article describes it:
A 1995 strengthening of the Community Reinvestment Act required banks to find ways to provide mortgages to their poorer communities. It also let community activists intervene at yearly bank reviews, shaking the banks down for large pots of money.
Banks that got poor reviews were punished; some saw their merger plans frustrated; others faced direct legal challenges by the Justice Department.
Flexible lending programs expanded even though they had higher default rates than loans with traditional standards. On the Web, you can still find CRA loans available via ACORN with "100 percent financing . . . no credit scores . . . undocumented income . . . even if you don't report it on your tax returns." Credit counseling is required, of course.
Ironically, an enthusiastic Fannie Mae Foundation report singled out one paragon of nondiscriminatory lending, which worked with community activists and followed "the most flexible underwriting criteria permitted." That lender's $1 billion commitment to low-income loans in 1992 had grown to $80 billion by 1999 and $600 billion by early 2003.
The lender they were speaking of was Countrywide, which specialized in subprime lending and had a working relationship with ACORN.
Investor's Business Daily added:
The revisions also allowed for the first time the securitization of CRA-regulated loans containing subprime mortgages. The changes came as radical "housing rights" groups led by ACORN lobbied for such loans. ACORN at the time was represented by a young public-interest lawyer in Chicago by the name of Barack Obama. (Emphasis, mine.)
Since these loans were to be underwritten by the government sponsored Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the implicit government guarantee of those loans absolved lenders, mortgage bundlers and investors of any concern over the obvious risk. As Bloomberg reported: "It is a classic case of socializing the risk while privatizing the profit."
And if you think Washington policy makers cared about ACORN's negative influence, think again. Before this whole mess came down, a Democrat-sponsored bill on the table would have created an "Affordable Housing Trust Fund," granting ACORN access to approximately $500 million in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac revenues with little or no oversight.
Even now, unbelievably -- on the brink of national disaster -- Democrats have insisted ACORN benefit from bailout negotiations! Senator Lindsay Graham reported last night (9/25/08) in an interview with Greta Van Susteren of On the Record that Democrats want 20 percent of the bailout money to go to ACORN!
This entire fiasco represents perhaps the pinnacle of ACORN's efforts to advance the Cloward-Piven Strategy and is a stark demonstration of the power they wield in Washington.
Enter Barack Obama
In attempting to capture the significance of Barack Obama's Radical Left connections and his relation to the Cloward Piven strategy, I constructed the following flow chart. It is by no means complete. There are simply too many radical individuals and organizations to include them all here. But these are perhaps the most significant.
The chart puts Barack Obama at the epicenter of an incestuous stew of American radical leftism. Not only are his connections significant, they practically define who he is. Taken together, they constitute a who's who of the American radical left, and guiding all is the Cloward-Piven strategy.
Conspicuous in their absence are any connections at all with any other group, moderate, or even mildly leftist. They are all radicals, firmly bedded in the anti-American, communist, socialist, radical leftist mesh.
Saul Alinsky
Most people are unaware that Barack Obama received his training in "community organizing" from Saul Alinsky's Industrial Areas Foundation. But he did. In and of itself that marks his heritage and training as that of a radical activist. One really needs go no further. But we have.
Bill Ayers
Obama objects to being associated with SDS bomber Bill Ayers, claiming he is being smeared with "guilt by association." But they worked together at the Woods Fund. The Wall Street Journal added substantially to our knowledge by describing in great detail Obama's work over five years with SDS bomber Bill Ayers on the board of a non-profit, the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, to push a radical agenda on public school children. As Stanley Kurtz states:
"...the issue here isn't guilt by association; it's guilt by participation. As CAC chairman, Mr. Obama was lending moral and financial support to Mr. Ayers and his radical circle. That is a story even if Mr. Ayers had never planted a single bomb 40 years ago."
Also included in the mix is Theresa Heinz Kerry's favorite charity, the Tides Foundation. A partial list of Tides grants tells you all you need to know: ACLU, ACORN, Center for American Progress, Center for Constitutional Rights (a communist front,) CAIR, Earth Justice, Institute for Policy Studies (KGB spy nest), National Lawyers Guild (oldest communist front in U.S.), People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), and practically every other radical group there is. ACORN's Wade Rathke runs a Tides subsidiary, the Tides Center.
Carl Davidson and the New Party
We have heard about Bomber Bill, but we hear little about fellow SDS member Carl Davidson. According to Discover the Networks, Davidson was an early supporter of Barack Obama and a prominent member of Chicago's New Party, a synthesis of CPUSA members, Socialists, ACORN veterans and other radicals. Obama sought and received the New Party's endorsement, and they assisted with his campaign. The New Party also developed a strong relationship with ACORN. As an excellent article on the New Party observes: "Barack Obama knew what he was getting into and remains an ideal New Party candidate."
George Soros
The chart also suggests the reason for George Soros' fervent support of Obama. The President of his Open Society Institute is Aryeh Neier, founder of the radical Students for a Democratic Society (SDS). As mentioned above, three other former SDS members had extensive contact with Obama: Bill Ayers, Carl Davidson and Wade Rathke. Surely Aryeh Neier would have heard from his former colleagues of the promising new politician. More to the point, Neier is firmly committed to supporting the hugely successful radical organization, ACORN, and would be certain back their favored candidate, Barack Obama.
ACORN
Obama has spent a large portion of his professional life working for ACORN or its subsidiaries, representing ACORN as a lawyer on some of its most critical issues, and training ACORN leaders. Stanley Kurtz's excellent National Review article, "Inside Obama's Acorn." also describes Obama's ACORN connection in detail. But I can't improve on Obama's own words:
I've been fighting alongside ACORN on issues you care about my entire career (emphasis added). Even before I was an elected official, when I ran Project Vote voter registration drive in Illinois, ACORN was smack dab in the middle of it, and we appreciate your work. - Barack Obama, Speech to ACORN, November 2007 (Courtesy Newsmax.)
In another excellent article on Obama's ACORN connections, Newsmax asks a nagging question:
It would be telling to know if Obama, during his years at Columbia, had occasion to meet Cloward and study the Cloward-Piven Strategy.
I ask you, is it possible ACORN would train Obama to take leadership positions within ACORN without telling him what he was training for? Is it possible ACORN would put Obama in leadership positions without clueing him into what his purpose was?? Is it possible that this most radical of organizations would put someone in charge of training its trainers, without him knowing what it was he was training them for?
As a community activist for ACORN; as a leadership trainer for ACORN; as a lead organizer for ACORN's Project Vote; as an attorney representing ACORN's successful efforts to impose Motor Voter regulations in Illinois; as ACORN's representative in lobbying for the expansion of high risk housing loans through Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that led to the current crisis; as a recipient of their assistance in his political campaigns -- both with money and campaign workers; it is doubtful that he was unaware of ACORN's true goals. It is doubtful he was unaware of the Cloward-Piven Strategy.
Fast-forward to 2005 when an obsequious, servile and scraping Daniel Mudd, CEO of Fannie Mae spoke at the Congressional Black Caucus swearing in ceremony for newly-elected Illinois Senator, Barack Obama. Mudd called, the Congressional Black Caucus "our family" and "the conscience of Fannie Mae."
In 2005, Republicans sought to rein in Fannie and Freddie. Senator John McCain was at the forefront of that effort. But it failed due to an intense lobbying effort put forward by Fannie and Freddie.
In his few years as a U.S. senator, Obama has received campaign contributions of $126,349, from Fannie and Freddie, second only to the $165,400 received by Senator Chris Dodd, who has been getting donations from them since 1988. What makes Obama so special?
His closest advisers are a dirty laundry list of individuals at the heart of the financial crisis: former Fannie Mae CEO Jim Johnson; Former Fannie Mae CEO and former Clinton Budget Director Frank Raines; and billionaire failed Superior Bank of Chicago Board Chair Penny Pritzker.
Johnson had to step down as adviser on Obama's V.P. search after this gem came out:
An Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) report[1] from September 2004 found that, during Johnson's tenure as CEO, Fannie Mae had improperly deferred $200 million in expenses. This enabled top executives, including Johnson and his successor, Franklin Raines, to receive substantial bonuses in 1998.[2] A 2006 OFHEO report[3] found that Fannie Mae had substantially under-reported Johnson's compensation. Originally reported as $6-7 million, Johnson actually received approximately $21 million.
Obama denies ties to Raines but the Washington Post calls him a member of "Obama's political circle." Raines and Johnson were fined $3 million by the Office of Federal Housing Oversight for their manipulation of Fannie books. The fine is small change however, compared to the $50 million Raines was able to obtain in improper bonuses as a result of juggling the books.
Most significantly, Penny Pritzker, the current Finance Chairperson of Obama's presidential campaign helped develop the complicated investment bundling of subprime securities at the heart of the meltdown. She did so in her position as shareholder and board chair of Superior Bank. The Bank failed in 2001, one of the largest in recent history, wiping out $50 million in uninsured life savings of approximately 1,400 customers. She was named in a RICO class action law suit but doesn't seem to have come out of it too badly.
As a young attorney in the 1990s, Barack Obama represented ACORN in Washington in their successful efforts to expand Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) authority. In addition to making it easier for ACORN groups to force banks into making risky loans, this also paved the way for banks like Superior to package mortgages as investments, and for the Government Sponsored Enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to underwrite them. These changes created the conditions that ultimately lead to the current financial crisis.
Did they not know this would occur? Were these smart people, led by a Harvard graduate, unaware of the Econ 101 concept of moral hazard that would result from the government making implicit guarantees to underwrite private sector financial risk? They should have known that freeing the high-risk mortgage market of risk, calamity was sure to ensue. I think they did.
Barack Obama, the Cloward-Piven candidate, no matter how he describes himself, has been a radical activist for most of his political career. That activism has been in support of organizations and initiatives that at their heart seek to tear the pillars of this nation asunder in order to replace them with their demented socialist vision. Their influence has spread so far and so wide that despite their blatant culpability in the current financial crisis, they are able to manipulate Capital Hill politicians to cut them into $140 billion of the bailout pie!
God grant those few responsible yet remaining in Washington, DC the strength to prevent this massive fraud from occurring. God grant them the courage to stand up in the face of this Marxist tidal wave.
.
Barack Obama and the Strategy of Manufactured Crisis
Posted: 29 Sep 2008 09:44 AM CDT
UPDATED: This article is now available, in full, on Wake up America here.
Here is documentation that irrefutably chains Barack Obama to the most odious leftist movements in the United States today.
Obama’s 'Truth Squad' Threatens Freedom of Speech
Posted: 28 Sep 2008 04:34 PM CDT
A bold maneuver, unprecedented in American politics, has pitted the Obama campaign against freedom of speech. Missouri authorities will pursue criminal charges against those who speak “falsely” against Barack Obama.
"Enlisting Missouri law enforcement to intimidate people and kill free debate is reminiscent of the Sedition Acts - not a free society.” (From a statement issued by Governor Matt Blunt on Sept. 24)
St. Louis City Circuit Attorney Jennifer Joyce and St. Louis County Circuit Attorney Bob McCulloch, both members of The Obama Truth Squad, have threatened to bring libel charges against those who speak out falsely against Barack Obama. Some say that such threats by Missouri authorities to pursue criminal charges violate civil rights. Many see this as an attempt by the Obama campaign at voter intimidation.
KMOV has a Sept. 23 video news report on this story. The report clearly shows involvement by the Obama campaign. This is an excerpt from the KVOV report:
“Sen Barack Obama’s Presidential campaign is asking Missouri law enforcement to target anyone who lies or runs a misleading television ad during the Presidential campaign . . . Prosecutors and sheriffs from across Missouri are joining something called the Barack Obama Truth Squad . . .”
According to Saint Louis CofCC Blog the attempts by the Obama campaign at voter intimidation are clear, but in actuality “virtually nobody that levels criticism at Barack Obama can be charged criminally for doing so.”
The implication here is also clear — if people with badges and guns are getting involved, they want Obama critics to shut up lest some cop will arrest them and send them to jail. We also found out from this news clip that this is indeed all at the behest of the Obama campaign. . .
Based on the 1964, the U.S. Supreme Court landmark decision, New York Times vs Sullivan, Saint Louis CofCC Blog goes on to explain that if a “prosecutorial authority brings criminal libel charges against a defendant on behalf of a plaintiff, as McCulloch and Joyce are threatening to do, then the prosecutor has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt to twelve out of twelve jurors that the defendant knowingly said or wrote something factually incorrect about the defendant.”
The two key concepts here are “knowingly” and “factual.” Successful civil libel lawsuits brought by public figures are exceedingly rare, because it’s very difficult to prove that the defendant “knowingly” said or wrote something factually incorrect. Criminal libel prosecutions thereof, because they require a unanimous jury and a higher legal standard of proof, are virtually impossible.
As for “factual,” it means that the statement made cannot relate to an opinion. If you say that Barack Obama isn’t really a Christian, that’s not a statement of fact, because religion is mostly subjective. The Catholic Church still really doesn’t consider Protestants to be Christians, and in some cases, some radical Protestants don’t think that Catholics are really Christians. Therefore, if one says that Barack Obama isn’t a Christian, it isn’t actionable, because it’s somebody’s opinion. Now, if Obama were a Catholic, and really was Confirmed as such, and someone for whom that it can be proven does know he is a Confirmed Catholic goes out and says that he isn’t, that’s actionable. The reason is that Confirmation in the Catholic Church is (usually) provable by ecclesiastical records.
Federal civil rights lawsuits could be brought against Missouri officials and the Obama campaign under several statutes such as the First Amendment Retaliation (under 42 USC Section 1983), or “under the KKK Act (42 USC Section 1985) – it is unlawful for two or more persons to form a conspiracy to use threats or intimidation to prevent the exercise of civil rights (including voting).”
Instapundit.com has listed several other attempts at free speech intimidation by the Obama campaign.
Stephen Kruiser of America Needs Me writes:
. . .There is a disturbing pattern of thuggish behavior by Obama and his supporters. Obama himself finally let the mask slip for a moment when he told supporters to go out and “get in peoples’ faces”. He then dispatched his minions to threaten and silence critics.
The Fredericksburg Free Lance Star has an editorial about the Obama campaign banning signs and banners during his rally Saturday at the University of Mary Washington in Virginia.
. . .Mr. Obama, the Democratic nominee for president, is scheduled to speak at a rally at the university today. The public is invited to this forum, on property it, the public, owns. However, signs and banners will not be allowed, according to the organizers and compliant campus officials. Suddenly, UMW is a First Amendment-Free, or at least a First Amendment-Crippled, Zone, subject to the self-serving preferences of politicos. Why does an Obama rally–or a McCain rally or a Nader rally–justify taking a little off the top of Americans’ most fundamental rights?
A UMW spokeswoman says that the Obama campaign required the sign-and-banner ban. That campaign tells us that the ban is for “security” reasons. But a spokesman for the U.S. Secret Service, responsible for protecting presidential candidates, says that the service has no objection to signs at rallies, provided that no “part of the sign could be used as a weapon”–e.g., a heavy metal pole or a sharpened stick. Finally, the McCain campaign tells us, “We encourage people to make signs at our events.” . . .
The First Amendment guarantees the freedoms of religion, speech, the press, peaceable assembly, petition of the government. Will one who aspires to the title Defender of the Constitution begin inhibiting these First Freedoms even before he is in office--at a public university?
Some are drawing inferences that Obama’s Truth Squad is a precursor to Obama’s plan for a civilian national security force. In July World Net Daily wrote:
Democrat Sen. Barack Obama's stunning assertion in a recent speech that the U.S. needs a "civilian national security force" that would be as powerful, strong and well-funded as the half-trillion dollar Army, Marines, Navy and Air Force is not included in published transcripts of his prepared remarks. . . Campaign officials have declined to return any of a series of WND telephone calls over several days requesting comment. Nor have they posted a transcript of the speech on their website.
Gateway Pundit warns Obama Stalinist Police State Already Taking Form
. . .Reminiscent of the beginning of the Stalin purges, the Obama “Truth Squads” seem to be the beginning of Obama’s plan to end free speech and create a police state that is beholden only to its secular messiah. Note: Stalin’s purges were affected by his country-wide police forces to silence political opponents. The Obama campaign has also advised Missouri law enforcement throughout the state to look for anything that the Obama campaign determines a lie. . . One of the most frightening aspects of all of this—as if it could become any more horrific—is that Missouri law enforcement now appears to be following Obama’s marching orders and it is being allowed to get away with these gangster tactics! . .
Here’s the statement issued by Governor Matt Blunt on Sept. 24.
Gov. Blunt Statement on Obama Campaign’s Abusive Use of Missouri Law Enforcement
JEFFERSON CITY - Gov. Matt Blunt today issued the following statement on news reports that have exposed plans by U.S. Senator Barack Obama to use Missouri law enforcement to threaten and intimidate his critics.
“St. Louis County Circuit Attorney Bob McCulloch, St. Louis City Circuit Attorney Jennifer Joyce, Jefferson County Sheriff Glenn Boyer, and Obama and the leader of his Missouri campaign Senator Claire McCaskill have attached the stench of police state tactics to the Obama-Biden campaign.
“What Senator Obama and his helpers are doing is scandalous beyond words, the party that claims to be the party of Thomas Jefferson is abusing the justice system and offices of public trust to silence political criticism with threats of prosecution and criminal punishment.
“This abuse of the law for intimidation insults the most sacred principles and ideals of Jefferson. I can think of nothing more offensive to Jefferson’s thinking than using the power of the state to deprive Americans of their civil rights. The only conceivable purpose of Messrs. McCulloch, Obama and the others is to frighten people away from expressing themselves, to chill free and open debate, to suppress support and donations to conservative organizations targeted by this anti-civil rights, to strangle criticism of Mr. Obama, to suppress ads about his support of higher taxes, and to choke out criticism on television, radio, the Internet, blogs, e-mail and daily conversation about the election.
“Barack Obama needs to grow up. Leftist blogs and others in the press constantly say false things about me and my family. Usually, we ignore false and scurrilous accusations because the purveyors have no credibility. When necessary, we refute them. Enlisting Missouri law enforcement to intimidate people and kill free debate is reminiscent of the Sedition Acts - not a free society.”
Technorati Tags: Missouri,Virginia,law enforcement,intimidation,voter,vote,authorities,Barack Obama,Obama,Truth Squad,freedom of speech,1st Amendment,civil rights,civilian national security force,University of Mary
Friday, September 26, 2008
Columbo asks Obama
Subject: COLUMBO
Ah . . . Sorry to bother you Mr. Obama, Sir.
Excuse me, Mr. Obama, I mean Senator Obama, sir. Um . . . know you are busy and important and stuff. I mean running for president is very important and . . . ah . . I hate to bother you. I will only take a minute ok, sir?
See, I have these missing pieces that are holding me up, and I was wondering, sir, if you could take time out of your busy schedule and help me out. You know, no big deal, just some loose ends and things.
Hey, you have a nice place here! The wife sees houses like this on TV all the time, and says, boy she wishes she had digs like this. You know? Is that painting real? Really? Wow. I saw something like that in a museum once!
Oh, sorry sir. I didn't mean to get off the track. So if you could just help me out a minute and give me some details, I will get right out of your way. I want to close this case and maybe take the wife to Coney Island or something. Ever been to Coney Island? No, I didn't think so. .
Well, listen, anyways, I can't seem to get some information I need to wrap this up. These things seem to either be 'locked' or 'not available'. I'm sure it's just some oversight or glitch or something, so if you could you tell me where these things are . . . I . . . I . . . have them written down here somewhere . . . oh wait. Sorry about the smears. It was raining out. I'll just read it to you.
Could you help me please find these things, sir?
1. Occidental College records -- Not released
2. Columbia College records -- Not released
3. Columbia Thesis paper -- 'not available'
4. Harvard College records -- Not released
5. Selective Service Registration -- Not released
6. Medical records -- Not released
7. Illinois State Senate schedule -- 'not available'
8. Law practice client list -- Not released
9. Certified Copy of original Birth certificate - - Not released
10. Embossed, signed paper Certification of Live Birth -- Not released
11. Harvard Law Review articles published -- None
12. University of Chicago scholarly articles -- None
13. Your record of baptism-- Not released or 'not available'
14. Your Illinois State Senate records--'not available'
Oh hey . . listen! I know you are busy! Is this too much for you now? I mean, tell you what. I will come back tomorrow. Give you some time to get these things together, you know? I mean, I know you are busy, so I will just let myself out. I will be back tomorrow. And the day after. ..'Who wants to know these things?' asks Senator Obama. Columbo answered:
'THE PEOPLE'
Ah . . . Sorry to bother you Mr. Obama, Sir.
Excuse me, Mr. Obama, I mean Senator Obama, sir. Um . . . know you are busy and important and stuff. I mean running for president is very important and . . . ah . . I hate to bother you. I will only take a minute ok, sir?
See, I have these missing pieces that are holding me up, and I was wondering, sir, if you could take time out of your busy schedule and help me out. You know, no big deal, just some loose ends and things.
Hey, you have a nice place here! The wife sees houses like this on TV all the time, and says, boy she wishes she had digs like this. You know? Is that painting real? Really? Wow. I saw something like that in a museum once!
Oh, sorry sir. I didn't mean to get off the track. So if you could just help me out a minute and give me some details, I will get right out of your way. I want to close this case and maybe take the wife to Coney Island or something. Ever been to Coney Island? No, I didn't think so. .
Well, listen, anyways, I can't seem to get some information I need to wrap this up. These things seem to either be 'locked' or 'not available'. I'm sure it's just some oversight or glitch or something, so if you could you tell me where these things are . . . I . . . I . . . have them written down here somewhere . . . oh wait. Sorry about the smears. It was raining out. I'll just read it to you.
Could you help me please find these things, sir?
1. Occidental College records -- Not released
2. Columbia College records -- Not released
3. Columbia Thesis paper -- 'not available'
4. Harvard College records -- Not released
5. Selective Service Registration -- Not released
6. Medical records -- Not released
7. Illinois State Senate schedule -- 'not available'
8. Law practice client list -- Not released
9. Certified Copy of original Birth certificate - - Not released
10. Embossed, signed paper Certification of Live Birth -- Not released
11. Harvard Law Review articles published -- None
12. University of Chicago scholarly articles -- None
13. Your record of baptism-- Not released or 'not available'
14. Your Illinois State Senate records--'not available'
Oh hey . . listen! I know you are busy! Is this too much for you now? I mean, tell you what. I will come back tomorrow. Give you some time to get these things together, you know? I mean, I know you are busy, so I will just let myself out. I will be back tomorrow. And the day after. ..'Who wants to know these things?' asks Senator Obama. Columbo answered:
'THE PEOPLE'
Thursday, September 25, 2008
A German's View on Islam
bject: Fw: The most profound message I've ever sent
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 19:13:01 -0500
This is by far the best explanation of the Muslim terrorist situation I have
ever read.
His references to past history are accurate and clear.
The author of this email is purported to be Dr. Emanuel Tanay, a well known and
well respected psychiatrist.
A German's View on Islam
A man, whose family was German aristocracy prior to World War II, owned a number of large industries and estates. When asked how many German people were true Nazis, the answer he gave can guide our attitude toward fanaticism. 'Very few people were true Nazis,' he said, 'but many enjoyed the return of German pride, and many more were too busy to care. I was one of those who just thought the Nazis were a bunch of fools. So, the majority just sat back and let it all happen. Then, before we knew it, they owned us, and we had lost control, and the end of the world had come. My family lost everything. I ended up in a
concentration camp and the Allies destroyed my factories.'
We are told again and again by 'experts' and 'talking heads' that Islam is the
religion of peace, and that the vast majority of Muslims just want to live in
peace. Although this unqualified assertion may be true, it is entirely
irrelevant. It is meaningless fluff, meant to make us feel better, and meant to
somehow diminish the spectra of fanatics rampaging across the globe in the name
of Islam.
The fact is that the fanatics rule Islam at this moment in history. It is the
fanatics who march. It is the fanatics who wage any one of 50 shooting wars
worldwide. It is the fanatics who systematically slaughter Christian or tribal
groups throughout Africa and are gradually taking over the entire continent in
an Islamic wave. It is the fanatics who bomb, behead, murder, or honor-kill. It
is the fanatics who take over mosque after mosque. It is the fanatics who
zealously spread the stoning and hanging of rape victims and homosexuals. It is
the fanatics who teach their young to kill and to become suicide bombers.
The hard quantifiable fact is that the peaceful majority, the 'silent majority,'
is cowed and extraneous.
Communist Russia was comprised of Russians who just wanted to live in peace, yet
the Russian Communists were responsible for the murder of about 20 million
people. The peaceful majority were irrelevant.
China's huge population was peaceful as well, but Chinese Communists managed to
kill a staggering 70 million people.
The average Japanese individual prior to World War II was not a warmongering
sadist. Yet, Japan murdered and slaughtered its way across South East Asia in an
orgy of killing that included the systematic murder of 12 million Chinese
civilians; most killed by sword, shovel, and bayonet.
And, who can forget Rwanda , which collapsed into butchery. Could it not be said
that the majority of Rwandans were 'peace loving'?
History lessons are often incredibly simple and blunt, yet for all our powers of
reason we often miss the most basic and uncomplicated of points: Peace-loving
Muslims have been made irrelevant by their silence. Peace-loving Muslims will
become our enemy if they don't speak up, because like my friend from Germany ,
they will awaken one day and find that the fanatics own them, and the end of
their world will have begun.
Peace-loving Germans, Japanese, Chinese, Russians, Rwandans, Serbs, Afghans,
Iraqis, Palestinians, Somalis, Nigerians, Algerians, and many others have died
because the peaceful majority did not speak up until it was too late.
As for us who watch it all unfold, we must pay attention to the only group that
counts; the fanatics who threaten our way of life.
Lastly, anyone who doubts that the issue is serious and just deletes this email
without sending it on, is contributing to the passivity that allows the
problems to expand. So, extend yourself a bit and send this on and on and on!
Let us hope that thousands, worldwide, read this and think about it, and send it
on - before it's too late.
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 19:13:01 -0500
This is by far the best explanation of the Muslim terrorist situation I have
ever read.
His references to past history are accurate and clear.
The author of this email is purported to be Dr. Emanuel Tanay, a well known and
well respected psychiatrist.
A German's View on Islam
A man, whose family was German aristocracy prior to World War II, owned a number of large industries and estates. When asked how many German people were true Nazis, the answer he gave can guide our attitude toward fanaticism. 'Very few people were true Nazis,' he said, 'but many enjoyed the return of German pride, and many more were too busy to care. I was one of those who just thought the Nazis were a bunch of fools. So, the majority just sat back and let it all happen. Then, before we knew it, they owned us, and we had lost control, and the end of the world had come. My family lost everything. I ended up in a
concentration camp and the Allies destroyed my factories.'
We are told again and again by 'experts' and 'talking heads' that Islam is the
religion of peace, and that the vast majority of Muslims just want to live in
peace. Although this unqualified assertion may be true, it is entirely
irrelevant. It is meaningless fluff, meant to make us feel better, and meant to
somehow diminish the spectra of fanatics rampaging across the globe in the name
of Islam.
The fact is that the fanatics rule Islam at this moment in history. It is the
fanatics who march. It is the fanatics who wage any one of 50 shooting wars
worldwide. It is the fanatics who systematically slaughter Christian or tribal
groups throughout Africa and are gradually taking over the entire continent in
an Islamic wave. It is the fanatics who bomb, behead, murder, or honor-kill. It
is the fanatics who take over mosque after mosque. It is the fanatics who
zealously spread the stoning and hanging of rape victims and homosexuals. It is
the fanatics who teach their young to kill and to become suicide bombers.
The hard quantifiable fact is that the peaceful majority, the 'silent majority,'
is cowed and extraneous.
Communist Russia was comprised of Russians who just wanted to live in peace, yet
the Russian Communists were responsible for the murder of about 20 million
people. The peaceful majority were irrelevant.
China's huge population was peaceful as well, but Chinese Communists managed to
kill a staggering 70 million people.
The average Japanese individual prior to World War II was not a warmongering
sadist. Yet, Japan murdered and slaughtered its way across South East Asia in an
orgy of killing that included the systematic murder of 12 million Chinese
civilians; most killed by sword, shovel, and bayonet.
And, who can forget Rwanda , which collapsed into butchery. Could it not be said
that the majority of Rwandans were 'peace loving'?
History lessons are often incredibly simple and blunt, yet for all our powers of
reason we often miss the most basic and uncomplicated of points: Peace-loving
Muslims have been made irrelevant by their silence. Peace-loving Muslims will
become our enemy if they don't speak up, because like my friend from Germany ,
they will awaken one day and find that the fanatics own them, and the end of
their world will have begun.
Peace-loving Germans, Japanese, Chinese, Russians, Rwandans, Serbs, Afghans,
Iraqis, Palestinians, Somalis, Nigerians, Algerians, and many others have died
because the peaceful majority did not speak up until it was too late.
As for us who watch it all unfold, we must pay attention to the only group that
counts; the fanatics who threaten our way of life.
Lastly, anyone who doubts that the issue is serious and just deletes this email
without sending it on, is contributing to the passivity that allows the
problems to expand. So, extend yourself a bit and send this on and on and on!
Let us hope that thousands, worldwide, read this and think about it, and send it
on - before it's too late.
Tuesday, September 23, 2008
Change--CHICAGO STYLE
Body count. In the last six months 292 killed (murdered) in Chicago , 221 killed in Iraq .
Sens. Barack Obama & Dick Durbin,
Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr.,
Gov. Rod Blogojevich,
House leader Mike Madigan,
Atty. Gen. Lisa Madigan (daughter of Mike),
Mayor Richard M. Daley (son of former Mayor Richard J. Daley).....the leadership in Illinois .....all Democrats.
Chicago is a combat zone. Of course they're all blaming each other.
Can't blame Republicans, they're aren't any!
State pension fund $44 Billion in debt, worst in country. Cook County ( Chicago ) sales tax 10.25% highest in country. (Look'em up if you want). Chicago school system one of the worst in country. This is the political culture that Obama comes from in Illinois .
He's gonna 'fix' Washington politics?
Sens. Barack Obama & Dick Durbin,
Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr.,
Gov. Rod Blogojevich,
House leader Mike Madigan,
Atty. Gen. Lisa Madigan (daughter of Mike),
Mayor Richard M. Daley (son of former Mayor Richard J. Daley).....the leadership in Illinois .....all Democrats.
Chicago is a combat zone. Of course they're all blaming each other.
Can't blame Republicans, they're aren't any!
State pension fund $44 Billion in debt, worst in country. Cook County ( Chicago ) sales tax 10.25% highest in country. (Look'em up if you want). Chicago school system one of the worst in country. This is the political culture that Obama comes from in Illinois .
He's gonna 'fix' Washington politics?
Alert about Obama from Kenya
Subject: Missionaries in Kenya know Obama
Missionaries in Kenya know Obama
Thought you'd find this interesting. Celeste and Loren Davis are Missionaries in
Africa and can shed some firsthand light on one of our Presidential candidates.
Thanks for sending out an alert about Obama. We are living and working in Kenya for almost twelve years now and know his family (tribe) well. They are the ones who were behind the recent Presidential election chaos here. Thousands of people have been displaced by election violence (over 350,000) and I don't know the last count of the dead.
Obama, under 'friends of Obama' gave almost a million dollars to the opposition campaign who just happened to be his cousin, Raila Odinga, who is a socialist trained in east Germany .. He has been trying to bring Kenya down for years and the last president threw him in prison for trying to subvert this country! December 27th elections brought cries from ODM (Odinga Camp) of rigged election. Obama and Raila speak daily. As we watch Obama rise in the US we are sure that whatever happens, he will use the same tactic, crying rigged election if he doesn't win, and possibly cause a race war in America .
What we would like you to know is what the American press has been keeping a dirty little secret. Obama IS a Muslim and he IS a racist and this is a fulfillment of the 9-11 threat that was just the beginning. Jihad is the only true Muslim way. We have been working with them for 20 years this July! He is not an American as we know it. Please encourage your friends and associates not to be taken in by those that are promoting him. It is world wide jihad. All our friends in Europe are very disturbed by the Muslim infiltration into their countries. By the way, his true name is Barak Hussein Muhammed Obama. Won't that sound sweet to our enemies as they swear him in on the Koran!? God Bless you.
Pray for us here in Kenya We are still fighting for our nation to withstand the same kind of assault that every nation, including America , is fighting. Takeover from the outside to fit the new world order. As believers, this means we will be the first targets. Here in Kenya , not one mosque was burned down, but hundreds of churches were burned down, some with people in them, burned alive. Jesus Christ is our peace, but the new world order of Globalism has infiltrated the church and confused believers into thinking that they can compromise and survive. It won't be so. I will send you a newsletter we sent out in February documenting in a more cohesive manner what I've tried to say in a few paragraphs.
Love, Celeste
Celeste and Loren Davis
About our Father's business!
Luke 2:49
Missionaries in Kenya know Obama
Thought you'd find this interesting. Celeste and Loren Davis are Missionaries in
Africa and can shed some firsthand light on one of our Presidential candidates.
Thanks for sending out an alert about Obama. We are living and working in Kenya for almost twelve years now and know his family (tribe) well. They are the ones who were behind the recent Presidential election chaos here. Thousands of people have been displaced by election violence (over 350,000) and I don't know the last count of the dead.
Obama, under 'friends of Obama' gave almost a million dollars to the opposition campaign who just happened to be his cousin, Raila Odinga, who is a socialist trained in east Germany .. He has been trying to bring Kenya down for years and the last president threw him in prison for trying to subvert this country! December 27th elections brought cries from ODM (Odinga Camp) of rigged election. Obama and Raila speak daily. As we watch Obama rise in the US we are sure that whatever happens, he will use the same tactic, crying rigged election if he doesn't win, and possibly cause a race war in America .
What we would like you to know is what the American press has been keeping a dirty little secret. Obama IS a Muslim and he IS a racist and this is a fulfillment of the 9-11 threat that was just the beginning. Jihad is the only true Muslim way. We have been working with them for 20 years this July! He is not an American as we know it. Please encourage your friends and associates not to be taken in by those that are promoting him. It is world wide jihad. All our friends in Europe are very disturbed by the Muslim infiltration into their countries. By the way, his true name is Barak Hussein Muhammed Obama. Won't that sound sweet to our enemies as they swear him in on the Koran!? God Bless you.
Pray for us here in Kenya We are still fighting for our nation to withstand the same kind of assault that every nation, including America , is fighting. Takeover from the outside to fit the new world order. As believers, this means we will be the first targets. Here in Kenya , not one mosque was burned down, but hundreds of churches were burned down, some with people in them, burned alive. Jesus Christ is our peace, but the new world order of Globalism has infiltrated the church and confused believers into thinking that they can compromise and survive. It won't be so. I will send you a newsletter we sent out in February documenting in a more cohesive manner what I've tried to say in a few paragraphs.
Love, Celeste
Celeste and Loren Davis
About our Father's business!
Luke 2:49
Saturday, September 20, 2008
Who/What are Obama Supporters
It is not Obama and his gang of thug Socialists who confuse me. I clearly recognize the principles of socialism and Communism in all of Obama’s “silk purse” speeches. It isn’t hard acknowledging right from wrong. In my last essay “Is any thing in America Sacred to Obama?” which lists many of Obama’s criminal friends, actions, and intentions which reveal a ruthless and desperate character. There is nothing I wrote in that piece that isn’t already known to all of the Democrats currently in office and the general public. There is nothing I wrote in that article that hasn’t already been written in long, scary detail by better writers than I. All of the information that keeps coming forward about Obama is disgusting, shameful, and proof he is unworthy to be a dog catcher let alone president. It is obvious no patriotic American will vote for Obama. He should be in jail.
What confuses me is how many people choose to support this silver plated turd in spite of the facts that has been exposed about Obama. Why? Do they think every person who states a negative of unpopular fact about Obama is a liar like the Obama camp wants them to believe? Don’t they realize they are coconspirators in their own tyranny? Don’t they care about the criminal, unethical, and mean spirited track record he has? Is it okay for Obama to do anything he wants as long as he is black? The argument Democrats will use that McCain has done bad things doesn’t hold water. True McCain has made mistakes. But one this for certain is McCain never betrayed his country and committed treason. He also never tampered with voter registration, nor ever was a Muslim.
This makes me wonder how much value society has for integrity, decency, and honesty. Have people placed a higher value on race than good character? I have always believed in the ultimate goodness of the common man. For the first time in my life, I am beginning to wonder if there are that many people in America who have traded goodness for evil. I am having trouble listening to Obama supporters on msm parroting Obama stump mantras. They are touting Communist principles and may or may not realize it. They are neither stupid nor bad.(At least I don’t want to think they are) What’s going on? I tried to break it down in groups and this is what has come forward to me.
Obama supporters fall into the following types:
1. The majority are hard working moral Americans whose only desire is a better America for them selves, their families and all. They simply misunderstand BO’s message. There is nothing in their mind that could lead them to recognize Obama’s messages are Communistic. If they did understand Obama’s message, they would not vote for Obama. There’s hope for this group because I believe they want a person of good character in office. They may change their minds and vote for McCain when more factual information about Obama comes forward.
2. There are black Americans who are decent good people who so dearly desire to see a black man as president for the first time in history, they only see Obama as good. They don’t understand Obama’s Communistic friends, background, messages, and intentions. They also don’t understand Obama will be of no benefit to them what so ever. Their loyalty is so strong, that even when confronted with facts about Obama’s crimes, they refuse to believe them. If these good people did understand, they would not only refuse to vote for Obama, they would throw him out of the circle. There are great black men and women who would make a wonderful commander and chief. It is only a matter of time American will enjoy a great black president. Obama is not the one. I believe some of these dear people may also change their mind.
3. There are decent people who are loyal to party regardless who leads, they do not challenge. They simply vote their party. Even these, may change their vote. They simply live an unexamined life.
4. Democratic politicians who lust to have a Democratic President at any price. They are clearly aware of Obama’s past crimes, his slimy friends and his Communistic/socialist principles. However they under estimate Obama and imagine they will be able to control him when he gets in office because they think they can advance their own careers riding his shirt tails. These people are coconspirators in their own tyranny. They would vote for Obama no matter what he does. They have a vested interest. God forbid, if Obama is elected, they will deserve what they get. Sadly. The people who didn’t vote for BO will also be hurt.
5. The very rich powerful invisible world players who have sinister purposes to make Obama President. They will be the power behind the throne. They will enforce Obama’s power with key players in key positions who do whatever they are told. Later, they may simply dispose of Obama, since he will no longer be needed by them. They will continue to live luxurious life styles.
6. There are openly admitted Communists, Socialists, and Muslims who will vote Obama. They will never change their minds. Eventually, like the UK, America will be adopting the laws of Sharia. Women will be required to cover their faces and wear Berkas.
7. There are the first time and young voters, who have simply not looked beyond Obama gold plated package of Communist feces. They are too busy growing up to take the time to look. They just want to do what they think is “cool”. By the time the realize what happened it will be too late.
8. Finally, there are those who are thoroughly aware of all of Obama’s crimes, misdeeds, and intimidating methods and approve. They have even participated with Obama in these crimes. To them, the end justifies the means. The way America was will be a fairy tale.
What confuses me is how many people choose to support this silver plated turd in spite of the facts that has been exposed about Obama. Why? Do they think every person who states a negative of unpopular fact about Obama is a liar like the Obama camp wants them to believe? Don’t they realize they are coconspirators in their own tyranny? Don’t they care about the criminal, unethical, and mean spirited track record he has? Is it okay for Obama to do anything he wants as long as he is black? The argument Democrats will use that McCain has done bad things doesn’t hold water. True McCain has made mistakes. But one this for certain is McCain never betrayed his country and committed treason. He also never tampered with voter registration, nor ever was a Muslim.
This makes me wonder how much value society has for integrity, decency, and honesty. Have people placed a higher value on race than good character? I have always believed in the ultimate goodness of the common man. For the first time in my life, I am beginning to wonder if there are that many people in America who have traded goodness for evil. I am having trouble listening to Obama supporters on msm parroting Obama stump mantras. They are touting Communist principles and may or may not realize it. They are neither stupid nor bad.(At least I don’t want to think they are) What’s going on? I tried to break it down in groups and this is what has come forward to me.
Obama supporters fall into the following types:
1. The majority are hard working moral Americans whose only desire is a better America for them selves, their families and all. They simply misunderstand BO’s message. There is nothing in their mind that could lead them to recognize Obama’s messages are Communistic. If they did understand Obama’s message, they would not vote for Obama. There’s hope for this group because I believe they want a person of good character in office. They may change their minds and vote for McCain when more factual information about Obama comes forward.
2. There are black Americans who are decent good people who so dearly desire to see a black man as president for the first time in history, they only see Obama as good. They don’t understand Obama’s Communistic friends, background, messages, and intentions. They also don’t understand Obama will be of no benefit to them what so ever. Their loyalty is so strong, that even when confronted with facts about Obama’s crimes, they refuse to believe them. If these good people did understand, they would not only refuse to vote for Obama, they would throw him out of the circle. There are great black men and women who would make a wonderful commander and chief. It is only a matter of time American will enjoy a great black president. Obama is not the one. I believe some of these dear people may also change their mind.
3. There are decent people who are loyal to party regardless who leads, they do not challenge. They simply vote their party. Even these, may change their vote. They simply live an unexamined life.
4. Democratic politicians who lust to have a Democratic President at any price. They are clearly aware of Obama’s past crimes, his slimy friends and his Communistic/socialist principles. However they under estimate Obama and imagine they will be able to control him when he gets in office because they think they can advance their own careers riding his shirt tails. These people are coconspirators in their own tyranny. They would vote for Obama no matter what he does. They have a vested interest. God forbid, if Obama is elected, they will deserve what they get. Sadly. The people who didn’t vote for BO will also be hurt.
5. The very rich powerful invisible world players who have sinister purposes to make Obama President. They will be the power behind the throne. They will enforce Obama’s power with key players in key positions who do whatever they are told. Later, they may simply dispose of Obama, since he will no longer be needed by them. They will continue to live luxurious life styles.
6. There are openly admitted Communists, Socialists, and Muslims who will vote Obama. They will never change their minds. Eventually, like the UK, America will be adopting the laws of Sharia. Women will be required to cover their faces and wear Berkas.
7. There are the first time and young voters, who have simply not looked beyond Obama gold plated package of Communist feces. They are too busy growing up to take the time to look. They just want to do what they think is “cool”. By the time the realize what happened it will be too late.
8. Finally, there are those who are thoroughly aware of all of Obama’s crimes, misdeeds, and intimidating methods and approve. They have even participated with Obama in these crimes. To them, the end justifies the means. The way America was will be a fairy tale.
Friday, September 19, 2008
Is There Nothing Sacred in America to Obama
What if a criminal profiler were given a file on the life and deeds of Barack Obama without knowing it was Barack Obama? How would Barack Hussein Obama’s character stack up in the eyes of a criminal profiler? Would the criminal profiler examine Obama’s child hood, the people who may have influenced his core beliefs, his education, his friends and associations, and his activities to get a composite picture? Would the sum total of that information lead the profiler to conclude the subject of his study is a beacon of light to lead America? Would a profiler conclude the subject of his study is definitely a dangerous criminal. I think he would conclude this is a demented soul decaying in a cess pool?
Let me see. There’s the right way, the wrong way and Obama’s way.
Obama’s modus operandi is gradually becoming very clear through a repeat patterns in his life. Simply stated it goes like this:
Obama recklessly breaks any laws or rules he deems irrelevant to his purpose at the time. If his holiness is caught and is asked to be accountable for said actions he counter attacks, denies, lies, intimidates, bribes, shuts up his questioners or sloughs off his misdeeds with inane explanations. Then he continues doing as he pleases. However, if he catches any one committing even a tiny infraction of the rules he seizes the opportunity for his own benefit and he relentlessly will nail him/her to the cross.
Thugs, terrorists, gangsters and unscrupulous characters from everywhere on the planet have infiltrated American politics in one form and another. They are all connected to each other through Barack Hussein Obama. These malevolent people are hiding in plain site. They have disguised them selves as altruistic community organizers, Christians, supporters, American patriots, contributors with large sums of money and friends. Most of them remain invisible as they manipulate the media, business people, and fraudulently register voters in all the states. They are lawless and dangerous. They have a track record to prove it. This is a matter of moral turpitude.
Since I don’t have a particular name for them I shall refer to them as Obama’s shadow thugs. They are involved in a sinister plot to steal America by getting control of government. If Obama should be elected, it is the shadow thugs who will control America. Obama will be the least of our problems.
Obama is just the front man and proof they exist. Obama is their creation. He is their puppet. Obama’s shadow thugs are highly experienced, extremely intelligent, enjoy fantastic wealth, and are totally ruthless. These power seekers will do anything, any time to any one to obtain their goals. They do not care who is used or hurt in the process. The proof of Obama’s shadow thugs and the silent but deadly work they do is that main stream media has not only favored Obama, but has covered up Obama crimes that should have made head lines bigger than O.J. Simpson!
If any reader thinks I am in the twilight zone when I talk about this then perhaps the reader could tell me why Obama is not only not in jail for the crimes he has committed against America but no TV interviewer ever has had the guts to confront his holiness about any of Obama’s long dirty laundry list. If actions speak louder than words, then what do Obama actions tell you? What do the actions of the thugs surrounding Obama tell you? These actions define a distinct pattern and reveal a sociopath. What does the actions MSM tell you? MSM is a coconspirator in betraying the American public.
Is there nothing sacred in America to Obama?
What public trust, state law, constitutional law, or ethic hasn’t he violated?
Let’s see,
2. Obama has repeatedly tampered with America’s precious votes in several states via Acorn.
(Acorn is a communist group that practices voter fraud by falsely registering voters or preventing opposing voters from voting is Obama’s claim to fame as a “community organizer.”
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/09/why_obamas_community_organizer.html)
3. He sabotaged at least two political careers we know of for his own political gain -- Hillary Clinton and Alice Palmer. He stole delegate votes from Hillary. He had Alice Palmers nomination petition nullified along with two other nominee. Consequently he won unchallenged.
(www.stoptheaclu.com/archives/2008/09/15/23422/5727
a. www.Texasdarlin.wordpress.com)
4. He literally gives the bird to producing documentation to prove if he truly is a naturalized citizen and eligible to president. Documentation on Obama’s citizenship. Is he eligible to be president under the Constitution. Philip Berg’s law suit www.Americanright.com
(http://www.americasright.com/2008/08/obama-sued-in-philadelphia-federal.html)
5. He doesn’t believe in free speech unless he freely “speaking”. He has his shadow thugs intimidate those people who write, talk, or publish information he is attempting to hide or threatens his chances for election.
(http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/18/chicago-thug-urges-cult-followers-to-get-thuggish-too/)
6. He doesn’t salute the flag, replaces the flag on his plane with his ugly Muslim symbol, and throws thousands of American flags in the in the trash in Colorado.
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCngeFqFoks)
7. He has ripped off millions in grants to benefit criminals like Tony Rezko, Blackwell, Bill Ayers, Reverend Wright, Railla Odinga, Acorn and who knows where else? Bill Ayers, Annenberg $150,000,000. Tony Rezko, $14,000,000.
(http://www.dontvoteobama.net/?)
8.Obama violates the Logan Act not once but twice! He had had no business supporting his Muslim cousin against the Kenyan government. (http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=149_1199587542, http://eakenya.org/newsevents/article.htm?id=8)
8. I know there are lots of master word manipulators of the truth who are going to argue he didn’t actually do that he merely did “blah, blah, blah. . .” No matter what defense Obama’s camp gives and how they dice words--he said this word in stead of that one-- it still doesn’t alter the fact in any way Obama was in Iraq where he shouldn’t have been. He was saying things he shouldn’t have been saying without the authority of the Untied States government. He was doing so at a time a grave danger to our beloved troops. It sure looks like he was trying to manipulate the Iraqi government for his behalf regardless is the words were exactly this or that! NO matter what is said in his defense, in my eyes is a traitor and he should be tried for treason.
There is no excuse for this!
Obama has committed treason against the United States of America for his political gain at the possible price of the very lives of American troops. Ruthless doesn’t even begin to describe the evil in this guy! How much worse can it get. Yet he is running around campaigning to become the President of the United States! Where are the headlines on MSM? The only big headlines we saw last week were whether or not Obama was referring to Governor Palin with his lip stick on the pig comment. No one is making Barack Hussein Obama accountable for his crime of treason, breach of fiduciary duty to his constituents, conspiracy to alter an election and Treason against America. If this isn’t proof of the existence of Obama’s shadow thugs and their conspiracy to steal America, then please tell me what it is. If moral turpitude is no longer an issue to Democratic voters, then let’s put Rodney King in charge of America’s criminal defense and O.J. Simpson on the United States Supreme Court.
(http://www.againstobama.com/2008/09/amir-taheri-says-barack-obama-is-lying/)
Let me see. There’s the right way, the wrong way and Obama’s way.
Obama’s modus operandi is gradually becoming very clear through a repeat patterns in his life. Simply stated it goes like this:
Obama recklessly breaks any laws or rules he deems irrelevant to his purpose at the time. If his holiness is caught and is asked to be accountable for said actions he counter attacks, denies, lies, intimidates, bribes, shuts up his questioners or sloughs off his misdeeds with inane explanations. Then he continues doing as he pleases. However, if he catches any one committing even a tiny infraction of the rules he seizes the opportunity for his own benefit and he relentlessly will nail him/her to the cross.
Thugs, terrorists, gangsters and unscrupulous characters from everywhere on the planet have infiltrated American politics in one form and another. They are all connected to each other through Barack Hussein Obama. These malevolent people are hiding in plain site. They have disguised them selves as altruistic community organizers, Christians, supporters, American patriots, contributors with large sums of money and friends. Most of them remain invisible as they manipulate the media, business people, and fraudulently register voters in all the states. They are lawless and dangerous. They have a track record to prove it. This is a matter of moral turpitude.
Since I don’t have a particular name for them I shall refer to them as Obama’s shadow thugs. They are involved in a sinister plot to steal America by getting control of government. If Obama should be elected, it is the shadow thugs who will control America. Obama will be the least of our problems.
Obama is just the front man and proof they exist. Obama is their creation. He is their puppet. Obama’s shadow thugs are highly experienced, extremely intelligent, enjoy fantastic wealth, and are totally ruthless. These power seekers will do anything, any time to any one to obtain their goals. They do not care who is used or hurt in the process. The proof of Obama’s shadow thugs and the silent but deadly work they do is that main stream media has not only favored Obama, but has covered up Obama crimes that should have made head lines bigger than O.J. Simpson!
If any reader thinks I am in the twilight zone when I talk about this then perhaps the reader could tell me why Obama is not only not in jail for the crimes he has committed against America but no TV interviewer ever has had the guts to confront his holiness about any of Obama’s long dirty laundry list. If actions speak louder than words, then what do Obama actions tell you? What do the actions of the thugs surrounding Obama tell you? These actions define a distinct pattern and reveal a sociopath. What does the actions MSM tell you? MSM is a coconspirator in betraying the American public.
Is there nothing sacred in America to Obama?
What public trust, state law, constitutional law, or ethic hasn’t he violated?
Let’s see,
2. Obama has repeatedly tampered with America’s precious votes in several states via Acorn.
(Acorn is a communist group that practices voter fraud by falsely registering voters or preventing opposing voters from voting is Obama’s claim to fame as a “community organizer.”
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/09/why_obamas_community_organizer.html)
3. He sabotaged at least two political careers we know of for his own political gain -- Hillary Clinton and Alice Palmer. He stole delegate votes from Hillary. He had Alice Palmers nomination petition nullified along with two other nominee. Consequently he won unchallenged.
(www.stoptheaclu.com/archives/2008/09/15/23422/5727
a. www.Texasdarlin.wordpress.com)
4. He literally gives the bird to producing documentation to prove if he truly is a naturalized citizen and eligible to president. Documentation on Obama’s citizenship. Is he eligible to be president under the Constitution. Philip Berg’s law suit www.Americanright.com
(http://www.americasright.com/2008/08/obama-sued-in-philadelphia-federal.html)
5. He doesn’t believe in free speech unless he freely “speaking”. He has his shadow thugs intimidate those people who write, talk, or publish information he is attempting to hide or threatens his chances for election.
(http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/18/chicago-thug-urges-cult-followers-to-get-thuggish-too/)
6. He doesn’t salute the flag, replaces the flag on his plane with his ugly Muslim symbol, and throws thousands of American flags in the in the trash in Colorado.
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCngeFqFoks)
7. He has ripped off millions in grants to benefit criminals like Tony Rezko, Blackwell, Bill Ayers, Reverend Wright, Railla Odinga, Acorn and who knows where else? Bill Ayers, Annenberg $150,000,000. Tony Rezko, $14,000,000.
(http://www.dontvoteobama.net/?)
8.Obama violates the Logan Act not once but twice! He had had no business supporting his Muslim cousin against the Kenyan government. (http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=149_1199587542, http://eakenya.org/newsevents/article.htm?id=8)
8. I know there are lots of master word manipulators of the truth who are going to argue he didn’t actually do that he merely did “blah, blah, blah. . .” No matter what defense Obama’s camp gives and how they dice words--he said this word in stead of that one-- it still doesn’t alter the fact in any way Obama was in Iraq where he shouldn’t have been. He was saying things he shouldn’t have been saying without the authority of the Untied States government. He was doing so at a time a grave danger to our beloved troops. It sure looks like he was trying to manipulate the Iraqi government for his behalf regardless is the words were exactly this or that! NO matter what is said in his defense, in my eyes is a traitor and he should be tried for treason.
There is no excuse for this!
Obama has committed treason against the United States of America for his political gain at the possible price of the very lives of American troops. Ruthless doesn’t even begin to describe the evil in this guy! How much worse can it get. Yet he is running around campaigning to become the President of the United States! Where are the headlines on MSM? The only big headlines we saw last week were whether or not Obama was referring to Governor Palin with his lip stick on the pig comment. No one is making Barack Hussein Obama accountable for his crime of treason, breach of fiduciary duty to his constituents, conspiracy to alter an election and Treason against America. If this isn’t proof of the existence of Obama’s shadow thugs and their conspiracy to steal America, then please tell me what it is. If moral turpitude is no longer an issue to Democratic voters, then let’s put Rodney King in charge of America’s criminal defense and O.J. Simpson on the United States Supreme Court.
(http://www.againstobama.com/2008/09/amir-taheri-says-barack-obama-is-lying/)
In Barack's Own Words
From Dreams of My Father:'I ceased to advertise my mother's race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites.'
From Dreams of My Father : 'I found a solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity against my mother's race.'
From Dreams of My Father:'There was something about him that made me wary, a little too sure of himself, maybe. And white.'
From Dreams of My Father: 'It remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names.'
From Dreams of My Father:'I never emulate white men and brown men whose fates didn't speak to my own. It was into my father's image, the black man, son of Africa , that I'd packed all the attributes I sought in myself , the attributes of Martin and Malcolm, DuBois and Mandela.'
And FINALLY the Most Damning one of ALL of them!!!
From Audacity of Hope:'I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.'
From Dreams of My Father : 'I found a solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity against my mother's race.'
From Dreams of My Father:'There was something about him that made me wary, a little too sure of himself, maybe. And white.'
From Dreams of My Father: 'It remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names.'
From Dreams of My Father:'I never emulate white men and brown men whose fates didn't speak to my own. It was into my father's image, the black man, son of Africa , that I'd packed all the attributes I sought in myself , the attributes of Martin and Malcolm, DuBois and Mandela.'
And FINALLY the Most Damning one of ALL of them!!!
From Audacity of Hope:'I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.'
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
Leave it to the Irish to boil it down to the essentials.
Whatever your politics, ....
An email from Ireland to all of their brethren in the States.............a point to ponder despite your political affiliation.
'We, in Ireland, can't figure out why you people are even bothering to hold an election in the United States.
On one side, you had a pants wearing female lawyer, married to another lawyer who can't seem to keep his pants on, who just lost a long and heated primary against a lawyer, who goes to the wrong church, who is married to yet another lawyer, who doesn't even like the country her husband wants to run !
Now...On the other side, you have a nice old war hero whose name starts with the appropriate 'Mc' terminology, married to a good looking younger woman who owns a beer distributorship !!
What in God's name are ya lads thinkin over in the colonies !
An email from Ireland to all of their brethren in the States.............a point to ponder despite your political affiliation.
'We, in Ireland, can't figure out why you people are even bothering to hold an election in the United States.
On one side, you had a pants wearing female lawyer, married to another lawyer who can't seem to keep his pants on, who just lost a long and heated primary against a lawyer, who goes to the wrong church, who is married to yet another lawyer, who doesn't even like the country her husband wants to run !
Now...On the other side, you have a nice old war hero whose name starts with the appropriate 'Mc' terminology, married to a good looking younger woman who owns a beer distributorship !!
What in God's name are ya lads thinkin over in the colonies !
Monday, September 15, 2008
Did Barack Obama Violate The Logan Act?
September 15, 2008
By Jonah Goldberg
Amir Taheri:
WHILE campaigning in public for a speedy withdrawal of US troops from Iraq, Sen. Barack Obama has tried in private to persuade Iraqi leaders to delay an agreement on a draw-down of the American military presence.
According to Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari, Obama made his demand for delay a key theme of his discussions with Iraqi leaders in Baghdad in July.
"He asked why we were not prepared to delay an agreement until after the US elections and the formation of a new administration in Washington," Zebari said in an interview.
Obama insisted that Congress should be involved in negotiations on the status of US troops - and that it was in the interests of both sides not to have an agreement negotiated by the Bush administration in its "state of weakness and political confusion."
"However, as an Iraqi, I prefer to have a security agreement that regulates the activities of foreign troops, rather than keeping the matter open." Zebari says.
Though Obama claims the US presence is "illegal," he suddenly remembered that Americans troops were in Iraq within the legal framework of a UN mandate. His advice was that, rather than reach an accord with the "weakened Bush administration," Iraq should seek an extension of the UN mandate.
While in Iraq, Obama also tried to persuade the US commanders, including Gen. David Petraeus, to suggest a "realistic withdrawal date." They declined.
By Jonah Goldberg
Amir Taheri:
WHILE campaigning in public for a speedy withdrawal of US troops from Iraq, Sen. Barack Obama has tried in private to persuade Iraqi leaders to delay an agreement on a draw-down of the American military presence.
According to Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari, Obama made his demand for delay a key theme of his discussions with Iraqi leaders in Baghdad in July.
"He asked why we were not prepared to delay an agreement until after the US elections and the formation of a new administration in Washington," Zebari said in an interview.
Obama insisted that Congress should be involved in negotiations on the status of US troops - and that it was in the interests of both sides not to have an agreement negotiated by the Bush administration in its "state of weakness and political confusion."
"However, as an Iraqi, I prefer to have a security agreement that regulates the activities of foreign troops, rather than keeping the matter open." Zebari says.
Though Obama claims the US presence is "illegal," he suddenly remembered that Americans troops were in Iraq within the legal framework of a UN mandate. His advice was that, rather than reach an accord with the "weakened Bush administration," Iraq should seek an extension of the UN mandate.
While in Iraq, Obama also tried to persuade the US commanders, including Gen. David Petraeus, to suggest a "realistic withdrawal date." They declined.
Obama--Betrays Soldiers
Justin Paulette
Sep 15th 2008 6:44PM
Filed Under: Barack Obama, Iraq
If this story is true, it is the most important revelation of the election.
Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari has apparently revealed that the centerpiece of Barack Obama's conversation with Iraqi leaders in July was his hope of delaying the draw-down of American military forces in Iraq. Zebari's recounts that Obama "asked why we were not prepared to delay an agreement until after the US elections and the formation of a new administration in Washington." Obama also reportedly insisted that Congress steer negotiations on the time-table of troops withdrawal, rather than the Bush administration, which he described as being in a "state of weakness and political confusion."
Obama's campaign has denied these accounts of his visit to Iraq. Such a private request for delayed troop reductions would run counter to Obama's public statements on Iraq, in which he calls for an immediate withdrawal. Further, an attempt to subvert the executive branch would be contrary to established U.S. foreign policy.
If Zebari's statements are discovered to be true, Obama would be guilty of the most unadulterated political profiteering and moral corruption in modern history. To seek electoral gain on the deception of a nation at war and the blood of American soldiers is nothing less than treasonous villainy - for which the offender ought to be tarred and feathered before being expelled from the country.
Sep 15th 2008 6:44PM
Filed Under: Barack Obama, Iraq
If this story is true, it is the most important revelation of the election.
Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari has apparently revealed that the centerpiece of Barack Obama's conversation with Iraqi leaders in July was his hope of delaying the draw-down of American military forces in Iraq. Zebari's recounts that Obama "asked why we were not prepared to delay an agreement until after the US elections and the formation of a new administration in Washington." Obama also reportedly insisted that Congress steer negotiations on the time-table of troops withdrawal, rather than the Bush administration, which he described as being in a "state of weakness and political confusion."
Obama's campaign has denied these accounts of his visit to Iraq. Such a private request for delayed troop reductions would run counter to Obama's public statements on Iraq, in which he calls for an immediate withdrawal. Further, an attempt to subvert the executive branch would be contrary to established U.S. foreign policy.
If Zebari's statements are discovered to be true, Obama would be guilty of the most unadulterated political profiteering and moral corruption in modern history. To seek electoral gain on the deception of a nation at war and the blood of American soldiers is nothing less than treasonous villainy - for which the offender ought to be tarred and feathered before being expelled from the country.
Sunday, September 14, 2008
Wake Up McCain, or Obama Is Going to Defeat You
Gone are the days of gentlemen politics and chivalry. The stakes are too high and the adversaries play by their own rules about which McCain and most decent Americans know nothing. Obama’s people are blind siding America. The signs are every where.
Obama, a presidential candidate is the defendant in a law suit filed against him in Philadelphia on August 21, 2008 and is interviewed by Hannity & Colms last week, and interviewed Saturday on Fox news net work and not one question is asked of him by his interviewers about the law suit.
Obama is named in a national petition to remove him as Senator of Illinois on the basis of unethical and criminal activities and no one ever mentions that in any of his TV appearances or interviews.
Very little is ever mentioned of the collection of nefarious characters Husein Obama has been related and connected to, inspired and mentored by, jointly raised money with, worked on the same projects and supported. It is a list of whose who of the dark side. Frank Marshal Davis, Reverend Wright, Bill Ayers & Bernadine Dorhn, Tony Rezko, Blackwell, Father Feghler, Louis Farrakhan, Dr. Khalid Adullah Tariq (aka Donald Warden),Raila Odinga (cousin) Obongo Obama (brother), Ahmed Yousef (Hamas) are just a few among a very long list. It is too long a list and the characters too similar. In Obama’s short time on this planet, it is no coincidence all these names are closely associated with him. These people are net work and foundation to the Obamas’ fundamental belief system. They are and have been his support group.
Whether or not Palin was for the “bridge to no where” before she was against it and lipstick have been the issues that literally millions and millions of dollars worth of coveted media broadcasting have been wasted. Is this one more method of censorship and controlling the of the press? Is the media flim flamming America? If the major media leaders fail to make issues of Obama’s crimes, lies, and denials but makes issues over some of the minor mistakes of Palin or McCain, I have to acknowledge that the media is being manipulated! The media is manipulating the public. We the public are being denied the facts about Obama we are entitled to know.
One of the most deviant characters to ever run for president has a long provable track record of criminal, unethical, and extremely suspicious friends and activities, and neither Republicans nor the media even mention it, let alone investigate. All of this information is known to media, the McCain camp, and any body seriously following this campaign. Why isn’t McCain campaign using some of the above information in their ads. The whopper—the law suit against Obama possibly not being eligible to be president due to the question of his citizenship should be blasted every where. Why isn’t it?
Obama, a presidential candidate is the defendant in a law suit filed against him in Philadelphia on August 21, 2008 and is interviewed by Hannity & Colms last week, and interviewed Saturday on Fox news net work and not one question is asked of him by his interviewers about the law suit.
Obama is named in a national petition to remove him as Senator of Illinois on the basis of unethical and criminal activities and no one ever mentions that in any of his TV appearances or interviews.
Very little is ever mentioned of the collection of nefarious characters Husein Obama has been related and connected to, inspired and mentored by, jointly raised money with, worked on the same projects and supported. It is a list of whose who of the dark side. Frank Marshal Davis, Reverend Wright, Bill Ayers & Bernadine Dorhn, Tony Rezko, Blackwell, Father Feghler, Louis Farrakhan, Dr. Khalid Adullah Tariq (aka Donald Warden),Raila Odinga (cousin) Obongo Obama (brother), Ahmed Yousef (Hamas) are just a few among a very long list. It is too long a list and the characters too similar. In Obama’s short time on this planet, it is no coincidence all these names are closely associated with him. These people are net work and foundation to the Obamas’ fundamental belief system. They are and have been his support group.
Whether or not Palin was for the “bridge to no where” before she was against it and lipstick have been the issues that literally millions and millions of dollars worth of coveted media broadcasting have been wasted. Is this one more method of censorship and controlling the of the press? Is the media flim flamming America? If the major media leaders fail to make issues of Obama’s crimes, lies, and denials but makes issues over some of the minor mistakes of Palin or McCain, I have to acknowledge that the media is being manipulated! The media is manipulating the public. We the public are being denied the facts about Obama we are entitled to know.
One of the most deviant characters to ever run for president has a long provable track record of criminal, unethical, and extremely suspicious friends and activities, and neither Republicans nor the media even mention it, let alone investigate. All of this information is known to media, the McCain camp, and any body seriously following this campaign. Why isn’t McCain campaign using some of the above information in their ads. The whopper—the law suit against Obama possibly not being eligible to be president due to the question of his citizenship should be blasted every where. Why isn’t it?
Saturday, September 13, 2008
Democrats, Don’t Vote America into Communism
Listen up America! America was founded on the concept of freedom, capitalism is moral, and free enterprise is for everybody. Sadly, due to inferior education, some Democrats wouldn’t recognize concepts of socialism or communism is they stepped into it, which they have. It is right before your eyes and ears if only you had the knowledge to hear it.
I know Democrats want a better economy than the one we experienced the last three years—not the last eight years as Obama likes to chant. I know Democrats want a free America and the right to free choice for all. I know what great and wonderful people Democrats are. I also know that in their frustration and desire for improvement on all these issues they have been mesmerized into thinking Obama is the one with the right ideas for America. I was a Democrat all my life as were two generations of my family before me until Obama was nominated. I supported Hillary. Obama is an out and out communist who will destroy every thing that has made America great. Listen to his words. He laughing at you in front of your face he thinks you are so dumb. Listen and you will hear nothing but the principles of communism spew from his mouth. His latest campaign ad of “change” says it all
Listen to every word Barack says about taxes, free enterprise, and capitalism and you will hear the verbatim words of communism. Wake up America before it is too late. Obama wants to tell you how much money you are allowed before he will take it away to give to others he deems need your money. He wants to control free enterprise and big company profits. If that’s not communism then I had better go back to school.
I know Democrats want a better economy than the one we experienced the last three years—not the last eight years as Obama likes to chant. I know Democrats want a free America and the right to free choice for all. I know what great and wonderful people Democrats are. I also know that in their frustration and desire for improvement on all these issues they have been mesmerized into thinking Obama is the one with the right ideas for America. I was a Democrat all my life as were two generations of my family before me until Obama was nominated. I supported Hillary. Obama is an out and out communist who will destroy every thing that has made America great. Listen to his words. He laughing at you in front of your face he thinks you are so dumb. Listen and you will hear nothing but the principles of communism spew from his mouth. His latest campaign ad of “change” says it all
Listen to every word Barack says about taxes, free enterprise, and capitalism and you will hear the verbatim words of communism. Wake up America before it is too late. Obama wants to tell you how much money you are allowed before he will take it away to give to others he deems need your money. He wants to control free enterprise and big company profits. If that’s not communism then I had better go back to school.
Fore Warned is Fore Armed, America!
Get worried Americans. Get scared. America is the object of desire by a ruthless, vicious, dangerous, and very, very rich group of Obama supporters who remain in the shadows.
While Americans have been focused upon enjoying their American way of life for the last 20 or so years, our enemies have been diligent. There is no doubt in my mind that they have been plotting to steal America one way or the other. What better way than by infiltrating the very system that makes us great—politics. Make a Muslim socialist the president. I don’t doubt for one second that Obama has been chosen to run for president when the first Muslim paid for Obama’s Harvard education. I also believe Obama is not a leader but a puppet. They have been grooming him since his early school days. They have poured millions into creating him. They will do what ever is necessary to make him president. They want America.
There is no doubt in my mind that Obama will win even though he will not be elected by votes. They will tamper with the electoral vote. They will tamper with the popular vote. He and his supporters will win at any price. No one should be surprised now or when it happens since Obama already has a track record of doing whatever it takes to get what he wants. First there is Acorn. Then there is Alice Palmer, Hilary Clinton, (stole the delegate votes), when Reverend Wright became a liability he threw him to the wolves. The list of Obama sacrificial lambs is long and scary. The worst has already begun. As much as I want McCain/Palin to win—As much as I believe the American voters will choose McCain/Palin over Obama, I fear the secret powers behind Obama will steal the election and declare Obama the winner. The legal system will convolute the facts to make it legal.
Our only hope at this time is to take Obama out of the race now.
Museumofinnocence.blogspot.com
While Americans have been focused upon enjoying their American way of life for the last 20 or so years, our enemies have been diligent. There is no doubt in my mind that they have been plotting to steal America one way or the other. What better way than by infiltrating the very system that makes us great—politics. Make a Muslim socialist the president. I don’t doubt for one second that Obama has been chosen to run for president when the first Muslim paid for Obama’s Harvard education. I also believe Obama is not a leader but a puppet. They have been grooming him since his early school days. They have poured millions into creating him. They will do what ever is necessary to make him president. They want America.
There is no doubt in my mind that Obama will win even though he will not be elected by votes. They will tamper with the electoral vote. They will tamper with the popular vote. He and his supporters will win at any price. No one should be surprised now or when it happens since Obama already has a track record of doing whatever it takes to get what he wants. First there is Acorn. Then there is Alice Palmer, Hilary Clinton, (stole the delegate votes), when Reverend Wright became a liability he threw him to the wolves. The list of Obama sacrificial lambs is long and scary. The worst has already begun. As much as I want McCain/Palin to win—As much as I believe the American voters will choose McCain/Palin over Obama, I fear the secret powers behind Obama will steal the election and declare Obama the winner. The legal system will convolute the facts to make it legal.
Our only hope at this time is to take Obama out of the race now.
Museumofinnocence.blogspot.com
Friday, September 12, 2008
Obama steals his words from a cartoon
“Don’t tell me words don’t matter. Words DO matter.”– Barack Obama, Presidential Candidate
Well now. Not only did Barack demonstrate, once again, that he’s a Sexist Pig, Tuesday when he made a remark about “Lipstick on a Pig” that was universally inferred to be aimed at VP Opponent Sarah Barracuda Palin…
NOW we learn that Obama stole (i.e. plagiarized) the entire script for the remarks leading up to the “lipstick” reference from a Washington Post Cartoon, as reported by Newsbusters
borrowed from the site of Texas Darlin
Well now. Not only did Barack demonstrate, once again, that he’s a Sexist Pig, Tuesday when he made a remark about “Lipstick on a Pig” that was universally inferred to be aimed at VP Opponent Sarah Barracuda Palin…
NOW we learn that Obama stole (i.e. plagiarized) the entire script for the remarks leading up to the “lipstick” reference from a Washington Post Cartoon, as reported by Newsbusters
borrowed from the site of Texas Darlin
Wednesday, September 10, 2008
Obama is Muslim
Malik Obama Confirms Brother Barack Obama IS MUSLIM
Malik Obama Holding Picture Of Barack(far left) with family members
Malik Obama confirms his half-brother Barack grew up a Muslim June 13, 2008
Barack Obama’s half brother claims that his brother, Democrat Presidential candidate Barack Obama, was raised as a Muslim. Contrary to the Obama campaign’s assertions otherwise. Malik says he will make a good president despite his Muslim upbringing.
Apparently the Obamas of Kenya have been reading those scurrilous emails to which Barack likes to refer, because they have no doubt — contrary to the claims of the Obama campaign, that the presidential candidate was raised a Moslem. They take that as a given.
As the Jerusalem Post reports, “Barack Obama’s half brother Malik said Thursday that if elected his brother will be a good president for the Jewish people, despite his Muslim background. In an interview with Army Radio he expressed a special salutation from the Obamas of Kenya.”
The Obama brothers’ father, a senior economist for the Kenyan government who studied at Harvard University, died in car crash in 1982. He left six sons and a daughter. All of his children - except Malik — live in Britain or the United States. Malik and Barack met in 1985.
In a remarkable denial issued last November that still stands on the official campaign website, Obama spokesman Robert Gibbs issued a statement explaining that “Senator Obama has never been a Muslim, was not raised as a Muslim, and is a committed Christian.”
Apparently Malik Obama, himself a Muslim, had not read the press release.
Melanie Phillips is the most recent commentator to draw attention to the massive body of evidence that leaves no doubt that Barak Hussein Obama was born a Muslim (Islam is patrilineal) and raised a Muslim (so registered in school, acknowledging attending Islamic classes, reported accompanying his step-father to the mosque, and able to recite the Koran in the original Arabic).
Reuven Koret, Aaron Klein and Daniel Pipes have previously pointed to the attempts by Obama and his campaign to conceal the candidate's Muslim background. The well documented evidence draws upon the on-the-ground interviews by researchers in Indonesia and Kenya, published quotations of Obama's childhood friends and his school records, as well as the candidate's own autobiography.
It is not clear whether Barack Obama will now disown his half-brother Malik, or throw him under the campaign bus, for acknowledging that shared family background. In any case, some one should notify "Fight the Smear" tout de suite. Perhaps they can get him with the program.
If this is true what else is Obama hiding?
Courtesy of the Israel Insider:
Malik Obama Holding Picture Of Barack(far left) with family members
Malik Obama confirms his half-brother Barack grew up a Muslim June 13, 2008
Barack Obama’s half brother claims that his brother, Democrat Presidential candidate Barack Obama, was raised as a Muslim. Contrary to the Obama campaign’s assertions otherwise. Malik says he will make a good president despite his Muslim upbringing.
Apparently the Obamas of Kenya have been reading those scurrilous emails to which Barack likes to refer, because they have no doubt — contrary to the claims of the Obama campaign, that the presidential candidate was raised a Moslem. They take that as a given.
As the Jerusalem Post reports, “Barack Obama’s half brother Malik said Thursday that if elected his brother will be a good president for the Jewish people, despite his Muslim background. In an interview with Army Radio he expressed a special salutation from the Obamas of Kenya.”
The Obama brothers’ father, a senior economist for the Kenyan government who studied at Harvard University, died in car crash in 1982. He left six sons and a daughter. All of his children - except Malik — live in Britain or the United States. Malik and Barack met in 1985.
In a remarkable denial issued last November that still stands on the official campaign website, Obama spokesman Robert Gibbs issued a statement explaining that “Senator Obama has never been a Muslim, was not raised as a Muslim, and is a committed Christian.”
Apparently Malik Obama, himself a Muslim, had not read the press release.
Melanie Phillips is the most recent commentator to draw attention to the massive body of evidence that leaves no doubt that Barak Hussein Obama was born a Muslim (Islam is patrilineal) and raised a Muslim (so registered in school, acknowledging attending Islamic classes, reported accompanying his step-father to the mosque, and able to recite the Koran in the original Arabic).
Reuven Koret, Aaron Klein and Daniel Pipes have previously pointed to the attempts by Obama and his campaign to conceal the candidate's Muslim background. The well documented evidence draws upon the on-the-ground interviews by researchers in Indonesia and Kenya, published quotations of Obama's childhood friends and his school records, as well as the candidate's own autobiography.
It is not clear whether Barack Obama will now disown his half-brother Malik, or throw him under the campaign bus, for acknowledging that shared family background. In any case, some one should notify "Fight the Smear" tout de suite. Perhaps they can get him with the program.
If this is true what else is Obama hiding?
Courtesy of the Israel Insider:
Cheap Words, Cheap Talk
What does “smear” mean as it is used in this campaign. Is the word “smear” a description of a lie about a person with intent to demean him/her in some way or it is a true fact with the intention to demean a person? Even if a statement of fact is negative is it a smear? In my opinion if statement is a lie, then it is a “smear”. If it is not a lie, but a statement of fact that might be relevant about a person. Then it is not a “smear”.
Voters need to collect as much information as they can about the candidates. They have a tough job separating fact from fiction, “smear” from relevance, and exaggeration from reality. The information flooding all media is greater than the Amazon River. What is so and what isn’t? What is so what?
First Palin was pro bridge. Then Palin changed her mind on the “bridge to no where.” She updated her information and made the right decision. Then she took credit for it in her acceptance speech. So What? Who or what harm was in that? She doesn’t lose any credibility for that. So Palin may have abused her power to attempt terminate her brother in law who was abusive to her sister. So What. She was merely protecting her family.
In her short 44 years on this planet she has blazed a trail of success while raising her children and enjoying a successful marriage. Palin is exactly what you see. A very capable Christian family woman in politics who is honest and sincere. Palin loves America and believes in spite of its faults it is still the greatest country in the world.
The only things Obama’s camp can use against her are cheap words and cheap talk to make minor issues into major focus is all that is. Another words, they are grasping at straws.
Obama is deeply rooted in the Muslim Faith. There is abundance evidence that proves that. He out right denies it. His “community organizing” is riddled with scandal and failure. Many people were hurt. He denies that. He was involved with Tony Rezko and $14,000,000 grant for public housing that failed. He denies that. Lot’s of people got hurt. Then there is the Bill Ayers involvement and the $150,000,000 they raised for better education that failed and no accounting of the money. Then there is the Blackwell scandal. Then there is the Reverend Wright scandal. Then there is the offending the government on Kenya by Obama for supporting his cousin Raille Odinga.
In the short 47 years Obama has been on this planet it seems he has spent a whole lot of time with the wrong people doing the wrong things. He has left behind him a glaring record of doubt and suspicion about who and what he is. That is what is so. It is not so what because this reveals a track record of activities and associations that could harm every American. Obama is not what you see. His time has been spent with dangerous people plotting dangerous activities.
Finally, Obama rants and raves America is bad and wrong. It must be changed from the bottom up. People have suffered too long. “He is change.” He and only he will change Washington and America. Just what kind of change will Obama bring? Stalin, Hitler, Edi Amin, Castro, were all great orators of change. The people were spell bound by them. Look what kind of change they got.
Voters need to collect as much information as they can about the candidates. They have a tough job separating fact from fiction, “smear” from relevance, and exaggeration from reality. The information flooding all media is greater than the Amazon River. What is so and what isn’t? What is so what?
First Palin was pro bridge. Then Palin changed her mind on the “bridge to no where.” She updated her information and made the right decision. Then she took credit for it in her acceptance speech. So What? Who or what harm was in that? She doesn’t lose any credibility for that. So Palin may have abused her power to attempt terminate her brother in law who was abusive to her sister. So What. She was merely protecting her family.
In her short 44 years on this planet she has blazed a trail of success while raising her children and enjoying a successful marriage. Palin is exactly what you see. A very capable Christian family woman in politics who is honest and sincere. Palin loves America and believes in spite of its faults it is still the greatest country in the world.
The only things Obama’s camp can use against her are cheap words and cheap talk to make minor issues into major focus is all that is. Another words, they are grasping at straws.
Obama is deeply rooted in the Muslim Faith. There is abundance evidence that proves that. He out right denies it. His “community organizing” is riddled with scandal and failure. Many people were hurt. He denies that. He was involved with Tony Rezko and $14,000,000 grant for public housing that failed. He denies that. Lot’s of people got hurt. Then there is the Bill Ayers involvement and the $150,000,000 they raised for better education that failed and no accounting of the money. Then there is the Blackwell scandal. Then there is the Reverend Wright scandal. Then there is the offending the government on Kenya by Obama for supporting his cousin Raille Odinga.
In the short 47 years Obama has been on this planet it seems he has spent a whole lot of time with the wrong people doing the wrong things. He has left behind him a glaring record of doubt and suspicion about who and what he is. That is what is so. It is not so what because this reveals a track record of activities and associations that could harm every American. Obama is not what you see. His time has been spent with dangerous people plotting dangerous activities.
Finally, Obama rants and raves America is bad and wrong. It must be changed from the bottom up. People have suffered too long. “He is change.” He and only he will change Washington and America. Just what kind of change will Obama bring? Stalin, Hitler, Edi Amin, Castro, were all great orators of change. The people were spell bound by them. Look what kind of change they got.
Monday, September 8, 2008
Governor Sarah Palin
As a woman who was abandoned in a strange city pregnant and penniless at the age of seventeen, I had to struggle to succeed --at times--in a very hostile towards women world. It made me strong and often fearless. I know had I not become that way, I might not have survived.
There are plenty of issues in which I disagree with Sarah Palin. There are just as many issues I do agree with her. I am a pro choice women’s rights advocate. I supported Hillary. Never the less there is every thing about Sarah Palin I respect. She is consistent with her own convictions. Basically her ideology and philosophy is consistent with the majority of Americans. Yes, there are some differences, I know. I cannot ignore Governor Palin’s obvious shining qualities. She has the qualities that make every woman proud to know her. She exudes honesty. She is competent. She has the courage of her convictions. She is highly intelligent. She loves family and country. These are the qualities of a good leader.
Governor Palin, like all human beings is not perfect. I know that. She has made mistakes. She like all humans, can learn from her mistakes and do better. If McCain becomes president and Palin vice president, I feel comfortable that Palin would make a very good president— if anything should happen to John McCain. More important, I feel comfortable she never has nor ever will get in bed with the enemy. I feel comfortable she will protect the America’s budget as if it were her own household. I am certain she will expose and disclose political corruption when it confronts her. I feel good she is not afraid to stand up to the America’s enemies and back them down if necessary. Even though I disagree with Governor Palin on many issues, I respect her character 100%.
It is not surprising the males of the press bashed her the way they did. Governor Palin’s polished presentation of her fearless acceptance speech was enough to make any coward—female or male cringe with fear. The first to recognize a formidable foe are the invisible, sneaking cowards’ of the world beginning with the male gender. What was more shocking to me was number of women who up until Governor Palin’s introduction to the world I had admired who shamelessly attempted to demean Governor Palin. Do they, too, feel threatened by this brave and confident lady?
Okay, disagree with her on many of her beliefs. I do. Challenge her on issues of vital concern to women’s rights. I do. In the heat of conflict sheds the light of truth. Truth leads us to a better world for all. That is what we all want regardless of what side of the fence we stand. Don’t grasp at lies, convolution of facts, and toxic gossip to destroy her because it will fail to do so and boomerang on liar. The false and hateful attacks upon Governor Palin are merely a revelation of the fear her adversaries have of her. They are symptoms of their weakness against Governor Palin’s honesty. What these lethal people fear the most is not Sarah Palin’s dishonesty but her credibility and honesty. They cannot control an honest person.
Though I was a strong Hillary Clinton supporter, I no longer will support her. It was a painful realization that Hillary is not the woman I thought she was. She sold out to Obama. She sold her soul. When she did that, she sold her principles and integrity with it. Senator Clinton sold the wonderful and loyal voters out along with herself. Though I had agreed with her more than I ever will agree with Sarah Palin, I have lost respect for Hillary, the woman.
There are plenty of issues in which I disagree with Sarah Palin. There are just as many issues I do agree with her. I am a pro choice women’s rights advocate. I supported Hillary. Never the less there is every thing about Sarah Palin I respect. She is consistent with her own convictions. Basically her ideology and philosophy is consistent with the majority of Americans. Yes, there are some differences, I know. I cannot ignore Governor Palin’s obvious shining qualities. She has the qualities that make every woman proud to know her. She exudes honesty. She is competent. She has the courage of her convictions. She is highly intelligent. She loves family and country. These are the qualities of a good leader.
Governor Palin, like all human beings is not perfect. I know that. She has made mistakes. She like all humans, can learn from her mistakes and do better. If McCain becomes president and Palin vice president, I feel comfortable that Palin would make a very good president— if anything should happen to John McCain. More important, I feel comfortable she never has nor ever will get in bed with the enemy. I feel comfortable she will protect the America’s budget as if it were her own household. I am certain she will expose and disclose political corruption when it confronts her. I feel good she is not afraid to stand up to the America’s enemies and back them down if necessary. Even though I disagree with Governor Palin on many issues, I respect her character 100%.
It is not surprising the males of the press bashed her the way they did. Governor Palin’s polished presentation of her fearless acceptance speech was enough to make any coward—female or male cringe with fear. The first to recognize a formidable foe are the invisible, sneaking cowards’ of the world beginning with the male gender. What was more shocking to me was number of women who up until Governor Palin’s introduction to the world I had admired who shamelessly attempted to demean Governor Palin. Do they, too, feel threatened by this brave and confident lady?
Okay, disagree with her on many of her beliefs. I do. Challenge her on issues of vital concern to women’s rights. I do. In the heat of conflict sheds the light of truth. Truth leads us to a better world for all. That is what we all want regardless of what side of the fence we stand. Don’t grasp at lies, convolution of facts, and toxic gossip to destroy her because it will fail to do so and boomerang on liar. The false and hateful attacks upon Governor Palin are merely a revelation of the fear her adversaries have of her. They are symptoms of their weakness against Governor Palin’s honesty. What these lethal people fear the most is not Sarah Palin’s dishonesty but her credibility and honesty. They cannot control an honest person.
Though I was a strong Hillary Clinton supporter, I no longer will support her. It was a painful realization that Hillary is not the woman I thought she was. She sold out to Obama. She sold her soul. When she did that, she sold her principles and integrity with it. Senator Clinton sold the wonderful and loyal voters out along with herself. Though I had agreed with her more than I ever will agree with Sarah Palin, I have lost respect for Hillary, the woman.
Saturday, September 6, 2008
Is Obama eligible to be President?
Born in the U.S.A.?
By: KEITH PHUCAS, Times Herald Staff08/25/2008
Email to a friendPost a CommentPrinter-friendly
PHILADELPHIA - A Lafayette Hill attorney filed a lawsuit in federal court Thursday challenging Sen. Barack Obama's claim to United States citizenship. The action seeks to remove the Democratic candidate from the November ballot.
To be eligible to serve as U.S. president, a person must be born in this country. According to Obama's birth certificate, which his campaign posted on its Internet site in June to quell rumors that he is foreign born, the Illinois senator was born in Hawaii on Aug. 6, 1961.
On Thursday, Philip Berg filed a temporary restraining order in federal court to bar Obama from running for president, claiming the Democratic candidate was actually born in Africa.
"We really don't believe he was born in Hawaii," Berg said. "We think he was born in Kenya."
The presidential candidate's father, Barack Obama Sr., was born and raised in a small village in Kenya, according to Obama's campaign Web site.
Berg's suit claims the senator's grandmother, brother and sister, who live in Kenya, believe they were present during Obama's birth in the African country.
Obama's mother, Ann Dunham, grew up in Kansas, and his parents met at the University of Hawaii when Dunham was a student there, according to the Obama campaign.
Eventually, Obama's father returned to Kenya, and his son grew up in Hawaii with his mother and for a few years in Indonesia after Dunham married an Indonesian man, Lolo Soetoro. Also, Obama lived with his maternal grandparents in Hawaii.
"If he was born in Hawaii, and he was adopted in Indonesia by Lolo Soetoro, (Obama) would lose his citizenship," Berg said.
The Obama campaign has a special section on its Web site, "Fight the Smears," that debunks the birth certificate story and other reports that have circulated about him during the campaign.
"It's part of a smear campaign," said an Obama campaign volunteer who identified herself as Rachel. "There are just so many lies out there."
The lawsuit claims three "independent" document forensic experts performed extensive tests on the digitally-scanned image of Obama's "Certificate of Live Birth" posted on the campaign's site and found the document to be "a forgery."
Jerome Corsi, author of the book, "The Obama Nation: Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality," has also deemed the birth certificate phony, according to The Annenberg Political Fact Check, www.FactCheck.org.
The Annenberg Political Fact Check, a project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania, aims to expose deception and confusion in U.S. politics.
Recently, FactCheck.org staffers "touched, examined and photographed" the original birth certificate kept at the Obama campaign headquarters in Chicago and concluded the document is genuine.
"The evidence is clear: Barack Obama was born in the U.S.A.," FactCheck.org staffers concluded.
Sean Smith, Obama's Pennsylvania communications director, was contacted Friday about the suit but declined comment.
The civil suit filed by Berg will be reviewed by the U.S. Federal Election Commission, according to Patty Hartman, a spokeswoman for the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
Keith Phucas can be reached at kphucas@timesherald.com or 610-272-2500, ext. 211.
By: KEITH PHUCAS, Times Herald Staff08/25/2008
Email to a friendPost a CommentPrinter-friendly
PHILADELPHIA - A Lafayette Hill attorney filed a lawsuit in federal court Thursday challenging Sen. Barack Obama's claim to United States citizenship. The action seeks to remove the Democratic candidate from the November ballot.
To be eligible to serve as U.S. president, a person must be born in this country. According to Obama's birth certificate, which his campaign posted on its Internet site in June to quell rumors that he is foreign born, the Illinois senator was born in Hawaii on Aug. 6, 1961.
On Thursday, Philip Berg filed a temporary restraining order in federal court to bar Obama from running for president, claiming the Democratic candidate was actually born in Africa.
"We really don't believe he was born in Hawaii," Berg said. "We think he was born in Kenya."
The presidential candidate's father, Barack Obama Sr., was born and raised in a small village in Kenya, according to Obama's campaign Web site.
Berg's suit claims the senator's grandmother, brother and sister, who live in Kenya, believe they were present during Obama's birth in the African country.
Obama's mother, Ann Dunham, grew up in Kansas, and his parents met at the University of Hawaii when Dunham was a student there, according to the Obama campaign.
Eventually, Obama's father returned to Kenya, and his son grew up in Hawaii with his mother and for a few years in Indonesia after Dunham married an Indonesian man, Lolo Soetoro. Also, Obama lived with his maternal grandparents in Hawaii.
"If he was born in Hawaii, and he was adopted in Indonesia by Lolo Soetoro, (Obama) would lose his citizenship," Berg said.
The Obama campaign has a special section on its Web site, "Fight the Smears," that debunks the birth certificate story and other reports that have circulated about him during the campaign.
"It's part of a smear campaign," said an Obama campaign volunteer who identified herself as Rachel. "There are just so many lies out there."
The lawsuit claims three "independent" document forensic experts performed extensive tests on the digitally-scanned image of Obama's "Certificate of Live Birth" posted on the campaign's site and found the document to be "a forgery."
Jerome Corsi, author of the book, "The Obama Nation: Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality," has also deemed the birth certificate phony, according to The Annenberg Political Fact Check, www.FactCheck.org.
The Annenberg Political Fact Check, a project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania, aims to expose deception and confusion in U.S. politics.
Recently, FactCheck.org staffers "touched, examined and photographed" the original birth certificate kept at the Obama campaign headquarters in Chicago and concluded the document is genuine.
"The evidence is clear: Barack Obama was born in the U.S.A.," FactCheck.org staffers concluded.
Sean Smith, Obama's Pennsylvania communications director, was contacted Friday about the suit but declined comment.
The civil suit filed by Berg will be reviewed by the U.S. Federal Election Commission, according to Patty Hartman, a spokeswoman for the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
Keith Phucas can be reached at kphucas@timesherald.com or 610-272-2500, ext. 211.
Friday, September 5, 2008
Suffer under Obama’s Change or blossom under McCain’s the Same?
Change. Change the magical word in the 2008 election campaign. Change an idea American voters all agree is necessary after the last eight years of American decline in economy and increase in complex problems representing all types of issues. What kind of change can we expect? Change can either be for the better or the worse. This is precisely the choice Americans will be making this twenty first century historic election. If the wrong choice is made, there will be no turning back. It will be a price Americans will pay bitterly the rest of their and their future generation’s lives.
Nothing comes of nettles but nettles. Nothing comes of corn but corn. Therefore one cannot plant nettles and expect corn to grow. No more than one can plant corn and expect nettles to grow. The fruit that comes forward can only be the result of the seed that is planted. So any good gardener knows very well to carefully choose the type and quality of the seeds he is going to plant in the garden. Soon America will be choosing the kind of crop is wishes to bring forward.
In two months American voters will be making a choice as to what kind of change it will experience hence forward. The choice is between John McCain and Barack Obama. Both will bring change. Each will bring a different kind of change. John McCain will not “bring more of the same”—as Obama and his paid henchmen like to say. Because the future quality of American life ultimately depends upon the kind of change America will experience as a result of its choice, there is no aspect about either of these men that can be over looked, ignored, diminished, rejected, or refused to be scrutinized in their back grounds, character and their spouses. The men they have been are the men they will be. The sum total of their belief systems and life experience is the knowledge they will be using when making presidential decisions that affect you and me.
Obama is a man without sufficient experience, who has a long track record of dealing with known criminals, is shrouded in mystery about his birth, may not be an American citizen, has repeatedly lied, hidden, and diminished information about his associations and background. He is a man of nettles. Since the beginning of his campaign, Obama has practiced lies, hypocrisy, convolution of truth, manipulation of the media, wasting of millions of dollars with the Annenberg project, and has a very controversial and suspicious wife. These actions are nettles. Barack Hussein Obama, like all Pied Pipers, seduces people suffering from lives of quiet desperation longing for a few seconds of feeling alive with glorious words of undeliverable promises of utopian change. All he will ever deliver is nettles. Nothing comes of nettles but nettles.
John McCain, as imperfect as he is, has a long track record of integrity, loyalty to his country, and goodness. There is no suspicion about his loyalty to country or the company he has kept. There is no mystery about his birth, his religion or his wife. He didn’t have to get into bed with a convicted criminal to buy his seven houses. John McCain is simply a “what you see is what you get”. There is no hypocrisy. McCain’s workers do not have to continually fight facts about his past record by saying the other people are lying. It isn’t necessary to have a “fight the smears web site” for McCain. John McCain is the seed of the corn I would plant. I know the only fruit that will come forward is corn. It will nourish the world.
Obama’s battle cry is that John McCain is more of the same (meaning Bush). It doesn’t take a Steven Hawking to know that is a lie. John McCain is not more of the same. Never the less, it is the Obama campaign mantra. Any one knows it is an old political trick to keep repeating the same lie enough times, people will start believing it. Well I have a new slogan:
John McCain is not more of the same but if he were, I would rather have more of John McCain’s “same” than suffer Obama’s “Change!” At least John McCain will do no harm! Only nettles will Obama produce.
Nothing comes of nettles but nettles. Nothing comes of corn but corn. Therefore one cannot plant nettles and expect corn to grow. No more than one can plant corn and expect nettles to grow. The fruit that comes forward can only be the result of the seed that is planted. So any good gardener knows very well to carefully choose the type and quality of the seeds he is going to plant in the garden. Soon America will be choosing the kind of crop is wishes to bring forward.
In two months American voters will be making a choice as to what kind of change it will experience hence forward. The choice is between John McCain and Barack Obama. Both will bring change. Each will bring a different kind of change. John McCain will not “bring more of the same”—as Obama and his paid henchmen like to say. Because the future quality of American life ultimately depends upon the kind of change America will experience as a result of its choice, there is no aspect about either of these men that can be over looked, ignored, diminished, rejected, or refused to be scrutinized in their back grounds, character and their spouses. The men they have been are the men they will be. The sum total of their belief systems and life experience is the knowledge they will be using when making presidential decisions that affect you and me.
Obama is a man without sufficient experience, who has a long track record of dealing with known criminals, is shrouded in mystery about his birth, may not be an American citizen, has repeatedly lied, hidden, and diminished information about his associations and background. He is a man of nettles. Since the beginning of his campaign, Obama has practiced lies, hypocrisy, convolution of truth, manipulation of the media, wasting of millions of dollars with the Annenberg project, and has a very controversial and suspicious wife. These actions are nettles. Barack Hussein Obama, like all Pied Pipers, seduces people suffering from lives of quiet desperation longing for a few seconds of feeling alive with glorious words of undeliverable promises of utopian change. All he will ever deliver is nettles. Nothing comes of nettles but nettles.
John McCain, as imperfect as he is, has a long track record of integrity, loyalty to his country, and goodness. There is no suspicion about his loyalty to country or the company he has kept. There is no mystery about his birth, his religion or his wife. He didn’t have to get into bed with a convicted criminal to buy his seven houses. John McCain is simply a “what you see is what you get”. There is no hypocrisy. McCain’s workers do not have to continually fight facts about his past record by saying the other people are lying. It isn’t necessary to have a “fight the smears web site” for McCain. John McCain is the seed of the corn I would plant. I know the only fruit that will come forward is corn. It will nourish the world.
Obama’s battle cry is that John McCain is more of the same (meaning Bush). It doesn’t take a Steven Hawking to know that is a lie. John McCain is not more of the same. Never the less, it is the Obama campaign mantra. Any one knows it is an old political trick to keep repeating the same lie enough times, people will start believing it. Well I have a new slogan:
John McCain is not more of the same but if he were, I would rather have more of John McCain’s “same” than suffer Obama’s “Change!” At least John McCain will do no harm! Only nettles will Obama produce.
Monday, September 1, 2008
Sarah Palin Walks the Walk
Sarah Palin walks the walk
It is not the situation that makes or breaks a person but his/her reaction to it.
The reality is Mrs. Palin’s daughter is none of the public’s business. It has nothing to do with her job performance. Obama’s people have been so severely weakened by the McCain/Palin ticket; they have to grasp at any straw in pitiful hopes of demeaning a great and good person.
“What of the cripple who hates the dancer?”
Those idiots who attempt to discredit Mrs. Palin because she is pro life but hunts moose, do not know the difference between human and animal. They are extremely confused regarding their own personal values and priorities! They continually reveal to the world their own toxic soul.
In the usual compassionate and dignified way that defines the greatness of Sarah Palin and her family, Mrs. Palin is acting in the highest and best way towards her daughter who happens to be pregnant. She is lovingly embracing and supporting her daughter through her rite of passage. How many young daughters now and in the past hundred years would have loved to have a mother as wonderful as Sarah Palin? These poor girls were humiliated, abused, rejected, and even murdered for the mere fact of being human and for however it happened-- becoming pregnant—not a crime, but a design of nature.
There is no doubt in my heart that Sarah Palin walks the walk and talks the talk. She lives and acts according to her sacred principles. She is in total harmony with her personal convictions and her actions. There is nothing but beauty, growth, blessings, and harmony that will benefit anything, any one touched by Sarah Palin. I am a pro choice woman who can respect others with different convictions than my own. I always admire those who live their principles. There is no hypocrisy in Sarah Palin. Consequently she has the power of credibility. Only good for all Americans if, God forbid, something should happen to Senator McCain, should he become president and Vice President Sarah Palin were to have to step into his place. Only good come forward for the whole planet if McCain and Palin win this election.
Copyright September 1, 2008
It is not the situation that makes or breaks a person but his/her reaction to it.
The reality is Mrs. Palin’s daughter is none of the public’s business. It has nothing to do with her job performance. Obama’s people have been so severely weakened by the McCain/Palin ticket; they have to grasp at any straw in pitiful hopes of demeaning a great and good person.
“What of the cripple who hates the dancer?”
Those idiots who attempt to discredit Mrs. Palin because she is pro life but hunts moose, do not know the difference between human and animal. They are extremely confused regarding their own personal values and priorities! They continually reveal to the world their own toxic soul.
In the usual compassionate and dignified way that defines the greatness of Sarah Palin and her family, Mrs. Palin is acting in the highest and best way towards her daughter who happens to be pregnant. She is lovingly embracing and supporting her daughter through her rite of passage. How many young daughters now and in the past hundred years would have loved to have a mother as wonderful as Sarah Palin? These poor girls were humiliated, abused, rejected, and even murdered for the mere fact of being human and for however it happened-- becoming pregnant—not a crime, but a design of nature.
There is no doubt in my heart that Sarah Palin walks the walk and talks the talk. She lives and acts according to her sacred principles. She is in total harmony with her personal convictions and her actions. There is nothing but beauty, growth, blessings, and harmony that will benefit anything, any one touched by Sarah Palin. I am a pro choice woman who can respect others with different convictions than my own. I always admire those who live their principles. There is no hypocrisy in Sarah Palin. Consequently she has the power of credibility. Only good for all Americans if, God forbid, something should happen to Senator McCain, should he become president and Vice President Sarah Palin were to have to step into his place. Only good come forward for the whole planet if McCain and Palin win this election.
Copyright September 1, 2008
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
